Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK U E <br />F'Au <br />time, it is staff's opinion that the Pine Lake Estatee initiatives <br />should now be completed. Therefore, staff is requesting that the <br />Board: <br />1. Consider and approve the staff -initiated request for certain <br />subdivision ordinance variances for Pine Lake Estates, as <br />described in greater detail further on this report. <br />2. Adopt the resolution attached to this report to establish and <br />accept rights-of-way within Pine Lake Estates, as described in <br />more detail later on in this report. <br />Note: in a separate agenda item from Public Works, the Board is <br />requested to adopt resolutions providing for the assessment for <br />surveying work and setting the public hearing date for the <br />assessment hearing. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Subdivision Variance <br />In order for the county to recognize all parcels of record within <br />Pine Lake Estates as "buildable", it is staff's opinion that the <br />Board should -grant variances from 2 sections of the subdivision <br />ordinance. These 2 sections are: <br />1. Section 913.06(1)(A), which requires that a subdivision plat <br />approved by the county be filed prior to subdividing property. <br />It should be noted that a similar county regulation was in <br />effect in 1961 when Pine Lake Estates properties were first <br />divided [reference Indian River County Subdivision <br />Regulations, Section III; effective date April 1, 1958]. A <br />variance from this section is needed so that all Pine Lake <br />Estates parcels of record (72 in all) can be treated as <br />legally created and buildable. <br />2. Section 913.06(1)(E), which requires a plat to be filed to <br />create new public or private road rights-of-way. A variance <br />from this section is necessary to'allow the Pine Lake Estates <br />road rights-of-way to be established by resolution rather than <br />by platting. <br />In- staff's opinion, these variances are warranted due to Pine Lake <br />Estate's unique circumstances and past treatment by the county. <br />During public proceedings to down -zone portions of Pine Lake <br />Estates to one acre zoning (held on August 18, 1982 and on January <br />5, 1983), the Board of County Commissioners established a policy of <br />allowing development of Pine Lake Estates to proceed under the <br />restrictions of one unit per acre zoning, while at the same time <br />recognizing and grandfathering -in then -existing parcels of record <br />that were smaller than one acre. In addition, in August of 1982, <br />the county and the original Pine Lake Estates developer commenced, <br />but never completed, a process to establish county rights-of-way in <br />Pine Lake Estates. That process resulted in the original <br />developer, Bertha Weissman, recording a "Declaration of Intent to <br />Dedicate Rights -of -Way". However, the rights-of-way have not yet <br />been legally described, and the county has not yet officially <br />accepted the dedication. [Note: The legal description and right- <br />of-way acceptance resolution are addressed further on in this <br />report.] Lastly, based upon the Board's pronouncements and the <br />mapping of Pine Lake Estates as a standard subdivision in the <br />Property Appraiser's tax parcel maps, some building permits were <br />issued in the 1980's to develop Pine Lake Estates parcels. Thus, <br />in the past, the county has treated the Pine Lake Estates parcels <br />October 25, 1994 <br />M <br />M <br />M <br />