Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Todd Wallner, 10425 93rd Lane, resident of Pine Lake Estates <br />for ten years, stated that when he bought his parcel and built his <br />home, that area was zoned R -1-E, residential one acre estates. He <br />asked if that zoning category will be changed. <br />Director Boling advised that in 1982 and 1983 the property was <br />zoned for one -acre parcels, and since then no parcels have been - <br />allowed that are less than an acre in size. However, there were <br />parcels less than an acre in size which existed before the one -acre <br />zoning went into effect, and the recommended action will not change <br />those parcels. We are not attempting to make more parcels than <br />what exist out there now. <br />Mr. Wallner was concerned that the one -acre parcels would be <br />divided into smaller parcels. <br />Chairman Tippin understood that nothing will change; we will <br />not add or subtract from the number of existing lots. <br />Commissioner Adams explained that the Board is considering a <br />resolution to accept the road rights-of-way as requested by the <br />residents of Pine Lake Estates. <br />Director Keating further explained that in the early 1980s the <br />zoning was changed from the single lot zoning to the R -1-E because <br />there was no infrastructure, no roads or drainage to accommodate <br />all the lots shown on the information map. The roads were never <br />dedicated to the County, therefore they did not exist, and the <br />County had no right to go out there and do anything to these roads. <br />Mr. Wallner stated that he and his neighbors are in favor of <br />the County maintaining the roads and drainage. <br />Commissioner Bird recalled that in the 1980s the Board tried <br />to make the best of a bad situation. The property owners combined <br />parcels and built their homes on bigger parcels, and wanted that <br />lifestyle, so the Board agreed to create the one -acre zoning. But <br />there were smaller parcels in that area and those smaller parcels <br />were grandfathered in. <br />Commissioner Adams noted that normally we do not accept roads <br />until they are brought up to minimum standards, but would make an <br />exception in this case. The Board was responding to a request from <br />the residents of Pine Lake Estates who have a problem. <br />Mr. Wallner assumed that the County estimated the cost to each <br />property owner to bring these roads up to standard. <br />Commissioners Bird and Adams explained that the Board was <br />-considering only the survey work, not estimating 'the cost to bring <br />the roads up to standard. The roads are not clearly defined _- <br />because they have not been maintained, some of the roads have <br />meandered onto private property, and this survey will show where - <br />the roads should be. The resolution would establish and accept the <br />23 BOOK ZJJ PAGE 51 <br />October 25, 1994 <br />