Laserfiche WebLink
The QRA relied upon a series of concept -phase Hazard Identification (HAZID) studies performed <br />in FECR's LNG fuel tender project' along with a review of intermodal Lift On/Lift Off hazards to <br />identify potential accident scenarios. A list of potential accident scenarios was developed from the <br />HAZID studies, literature review, and review of FECR intermodal facilities and was used to <br />define a reduced list of representative accidental release scenarios for the QRA. <br />The _ISO tank container movements were grouped into three distinct activities, <br />distinguished by the type of operations and the risks present: <br />1. Lift On and yard movement at the Hialeah Rail Yard. <br />2. Mainline train movement. <br />3. Lift Off and yard movement at the receiving yard/intermodal facility. <br />The hazard scenarios corresponded to accidents involving the ISO tank, which is a (b) (4) <br />. Accident event <br />trees were constructed describing the necessary events and the frequency or probability of <br />each step occurring to lead to a loss of containment (LOC) and ultimately a fire and/or <br />explosion. Representative accident/failure frequency and probability values were developed <br />from industryavailable databases and FRA rail accident statistics. Several conservative <br />assumptions were applied during the analysis to estimate failure probabilities for the LNG <br />ISOs since no specific historical data exists for this operation. The assumptions may be <br />evaluated and changed based upon new information, and this may lead to different and likely <br />lower (ie., less conservative) failure probabilities (e.g., lower risk). It was assumed that each <br />train includes 0 LNG ISO containers single -stacked in well cars, and 0 cars were shipped <br />every day of the year. Further, (4) each of the three routes was evaluated independently to <br />bound the maximum potential risk by (4) assuming shipment via only one route. If the <br />LNG ISOs are split among multiple routes, then the risk calculated for each route would <br />decrease. 4 <br />U.S. Census population data and Port passenger statistics were used to represent the populations <br />surrounding the mainline rail routes, rail yards, and intermodal facilities. The populations along <br />the proposed mainline routes were evaluated as aggregated population groupings within 1.6 <br />miles from the rail yards and either side of the rail mainline. Along the mainline, the population <br />was evaluated within approximately one -mile increments along the route. The maximum <br />onerrnle population density was 11,800 people per square mile, which occurred in the Miami <br />area. This population value was used to conservatively bound the risk for mainline movement of <br />LNG ISOs. <br />Exponent Project No. 1308194.000 report titled: "HAZID Study Report, Florida East Coast Railway Dual -Fuel <br />Locomotive LNG Tender Project," issued January 2, 2015. Exponent Project No. 1308194.000 report titled: <br />"HAZID Study Report, Florida East Coast Railway Dual -Fuel Locomotive LNG Tender Project, Updated to <br />Reflect Chart LNG Tender," issued October 24, 2014. Exponent Project No. 1308194.000 report titled: <br />"Integration HAZID Study Report, Florida East Coast Railway Dual -Fuel Locomotive and LNG Tender Project," <br />issued December 12, 2014. <br />1308194.001 - 5691 xv <br />