Laserfiche WebLink
account an updated Phosphorus Index when applying biosolids, in effect, limiting the application of Class B <br />biosolids to the level of phosphorus that can be used by the plants as opposed to applying excess that may <br />run off into the environment. When comparing the acceptable, permitted application of Class B biosolids <br />on agricultural land to the Phosphorus Index (as demonstrated in the chart below prepared by JA staff). In <br />the chart, each dot represents the calculated Phosphorus Index result from samples that were collected by <br />OF/IFAS staff in biosolids application zones identified in the site's Nutrient Management Plan. The negative <br />Phosphorus Capacity Index indicates that for those dots in red (below the P Balance line), the soil/plants <br />have no additional capacity to hold/absorb the excess phosphorus. Any excess phosphorus deposited on <br />site is susceptible to run-off or groundwater intrusion as opposed to being taken up by the soil and/or <br />plants. This demonstrates that, by following the current rules, excess phosphorus has been and can <br />continue to be applied in the BCL watershed unless regulatory changes are made. <br />PCI <br />30 <br />20 • P :Balance <br />10 <br />e s • P Deficit <br />-14 0;0 O o P Surplus <br />_20 o O O <br />-30 O <br />-40 O O 60 <br />50 O <br />O <br />-60 <br />0 20 40 60 so 100 120 140 <br />Lbs of total phosphorus applied per acre per year (2013-2017) <br />CONCLUSIONS: <br />The property owner at BCL has been very cooperative with the regulatory agencies and has voluntarily <br />ceased any biosolid applications since May 2018. The property owner has allowed the regulatory agencies <br />access to private property in orderto install data collection stations and collect samples to help understand <br />the complex dynamics of weather, nutrient loadings and nutrient transport over time. The owner should <br />be commended for his willingness to assist in this endeavor. Also of note is the detailed investigation <br />process/plan that the FDEP, SJRWMD and IFAS put together to cooperatively work to gather this <br />information and analyze it in a way that helps to determine what is/is not happening in the Upper Basin, <br />including BCL. Staff from these organizations have been very professional and helpful in assisting the <br />County with the results of their ongoing investigations. Some of the historical data collected have been <br />analyzed by the County's consultant and are included as Attachment 2. <br />FDEP staff has indicated that while the prior application rates and procedures used by the FDEP permittees <br />for land application of biosolids followed the rules in effect at that time, it is evident that there are some <br />inconsistencies with the way the program is structured. There has been a sustained upward trend in total <br />phosphorus concentrations in BCL, which has a strong correlation to the increase in the regulated <br />application of Class B biosolids within the BCL Watershed. While the data are compelling, studies from the <br />regulatory agencies and experts continue and are not yet complete. <br />138 <br />