My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2018
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2018
>
12/11/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2021 12:57:18 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 4:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/11/2018
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Representatives from FDEP commented that the data collected to date support the notion that the BCL <br />Watershed would be on the FDEP's list for phosphorus impairment. This designation will lead to the <br />creation of a Total Maximum Daily Loading (TMDL) amount that will define the phosphorus loading limits <br />for the lake's watershed and the creation of a Basin Management Action Plan (EMAP) to remediate the <br />loads. This process is likely to take two years or longer based on the typical regulatory process. If the <br />application of Class B biosolids were to continue in the BCL watershed during this rule creation timeframe, <br />it is likely that the phosphorus levels in BCL would continue to increase. The revised Phosphorus Index and <br />recent data collected support this conclusion. Consistent with the preliminary findings from the TAC, <br />reports from OF/IFAS, and data presented by SJRWMD, there are concerns that the existing rules and <br />methodologies may be outdated and need review in order to account for all nutrients making their way to <br />the environment. <br />Curtailing any additional phosphorus inputs to the lake from the surrounding watershed is not the only <br />remedy, but will assist in the process of lake recovery. Although immediate action would be beneficial, it <br />should be recognized that the lake's response to reduced loadings may not be immediate. It has been <br />estimated that removing nutrients from the environment through some type of site remediation activity <br />may cost on order of three (3) magnitudes or greater than the cost of preventing the loading from taking <br />place initially. Therefore, prevention of further phosphorus loading is prudent. <br />The following possible action items are offered for the BCC to consider: <br />1. Discontinue Moratorium - Let the existing six-month moratorium expire. The BCC approved <br />moratorium became effective July 18, 2018, and expires January 14, 2019. This would allow <br />permitted land application of Class B biosolids to continue. <br />Extend the Moratorium on the permitted land application of biosolids until such a time that the <br />Biosolids TAC can provide feedback on their charge questions and furnish the FDEP with the <br />information that may be necessary for FDEP to revise the current rules regarding the land <br />application of Class B biosolids included in the Florida Administrative Code. This moratorium <br />extension would also allow more time for the regulatory agencies to continue collaborating to <br />gather more data in and around BCL, and possibly refine science -based recommendations. Staff <br />recommends the BCC provide direction on authorizing staff to bring back an ordinance and hold a <br />public hearing at the January 8, 2019, meeting to extend the moratorium. <br />Pursue an Emergency Order request through the FDEP that would restrict the application of Class <br />B biosolids within Indian River County to ensure a no net increase to the Phosphorus loads on the <br />land applied material. Pursuant to section 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, an emergency rule shall not <br />be effective for a period longer than 90 days and shall not be renewable, except when the agency <br />has initiated rulemaking to adopt rules addressingthe subject of the emergency rule and either: 1) <br />A challenge to the proposed rules has been filed and remains pending; or 2) The proposed rules <br />are awaiting ratification by the Legislature. <br />Combination of 2 and 3. This approach would provide for protection of BCL tied to the conclusion <br />of the biosolids TAC and allow for additional investigations into future legislative initiatives to <br />protect the watershed, similar to what is in effect for the Okeechobee, St. Lucie River and <br />Caloosahatchee River watershed under the Northern Everglades and Estuaries Program. <br />139 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.