My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/02/2018 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2018
>
08/02/2018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 1:36:19 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 1:28:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
08/02/2018
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Organizational Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Wonsetler, Esq. Writing Sample - Prior Report 201.5 <br /> & Recommendation <br /> Findings of Fact <br /> Petitioner,Huntington Reserve Assoc.,LTD,was not present at the hearing'held on December <br /> 11,2013,but rather was represented by attorneys Mr.Frank Brady and Jeanne Brady. The <br /> documentation submitted by the Petitioner shall be referred to in general terms as Petitioner's <br /> Composite Exhibit 1. <br /> The Property Appraiser's Office was represented at hearing by Sendy Shaffer, Coordinator of <br /> Exemption Services and by attorney Gaylord Wood,Jr., and the Property Appraiser's Office did <br /> submit a nine (9) section set of documents in support of its position that the denial was <br /> appropriate in this matter. The documentation submitted by the Property Appraiser's Office. <br /> shall be referred to in general terms as Property Appraiser's Composite Exhibit A. <br /> hi addition to the documentation presented by the parties,each presented memorandums of law <br /> andfact in support of their respective positions. <br /> Historically,the subject property has not enjoyed the benefit of the Affordable Housing <br /> Exemption. This initial 2013 application was denied by the Property Appraiser's Office in June <br /> 2013 for a number of reasons,the main reason relating to the Property Appraiser's determination <br /> that based upon the composition of the Petitioner's corporate entity,that the housing operation is <br /> run in such a manner as to inure to the benefit of the for-profit partners. The denial of this initial <br /> application in no manner related to the change in the relevant Florida Statute with a July 1,2013 <br /> effective date and with retroactive effect. As such,this hearing in no manner involved any <br /> analysis as to the constitutionality of the recent change in the Affordable Housing statute. <br /> The Petitioner appealed the denial and did raise an argument regarding both the Petitioner's <br /> eligibility as a not-for-profit organization and arguments regarding the unconstitutionality of the <br /> recent statutory change. Despite stating affirmatively in Petitioner's factual memorandum, <br /> Petitioner did.not enjoy the Affordable Housing exemption in at least the prior three years, and <br /> as such,the Petitioner's argument that a`vested right' was interrupted and denied is factually <br /> inaccurate and inapplicable in the case at hand. Again, as the Property Appraiser did not deny <br /> the application on the 2013 legislative change,but upon the law as in effect for 2012, specifically <br /> in effect as of January 1,2013,such arguments are unnecessary and outside of the scope of this <br /> •• hearing. <br /> Petitioner has set forth in its documentation and evidence that"The Partnership,Inc."is a non- <br /> profit Florida corporation with an overall ownership interest in the limited partnership which <br /> owns the property. The amount of that interest is 0.009%. Huntington Reserve Associates,Ltd <br /> is the limited partnership. <br /> Per the Property Appraiser's analysis,Huntington Reserve Associates,Ltd is a for profit entity <br /> based upon the fact that it files taxes on a for-profit rather than on.a non-for-profit tax form. The <br /> Property Appraiser further argues that the tax structure of the partnership entities underscores the <br /> fact that the subject property is run in such a manner as to create a profit and to shift the benefit <br /> of any taxation credits or exemptions. <br /> - 15 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.