Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan <br /> Transportation Element <br /> Transportation impact fees are county fees imposed on new development to cover the costs of <br /> anticipated roadway capacity improvements. Enacted in 1986, the County's traffic impact fee <br /> ordinance establishes a traffic impact fee that is based on a formula related to the projected <br /> traffic impacts of proposed developments. Originally, the county established nine (9) separate <br /> impact fee districts. Each of the nine districts imposed a different impact fee for each different <br /> type of development. <br /> Currently, there is one county traffic impact fee for each different type of development, and fees <br /> are now collected within three (3) traffic impact fee districts. According to county regulations, <br /> the revenue must be spent for transportation system capacity producing improvements in the <br /> district from which it was obtained. During the FY 2005/06 development "boom", total impact <br /> fee revenue collected was $32,844,618.21$36,297,000.00. Since After that time; during the <br /> "great recession",however, new revenue has-declined significantly but has stabilized to a modest <br /> level of$5,704,000.00 in FY 2016/17. <br /> Tables 4.8A and 4.8B summarize transportation capital and operating revenues for all state and <br /> local financing mechanisms through the planning time horizon of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Through 2030, state and federal capital revenue is expected to be $195 million, while total <br /> capital revenues for the county are estimated at $461 million. This includes all impact fee and <br /> gas tax revenue sources for the county. It also includes enhanced revenues through 2030 in the <br /> form of revised impact fees, continuation of the 1-cent sales tax, and, beginning in 2010, <br /> imposition of the second local option gas tax. Operating and maintenance revenues for the <br /> county total an estimated $251.7 million through this same time horizon. <br /> • Transit Revenues <br /> With respect to the transit system, grant funding remains the most significant source of revenue. <br /> In 20052018, the MPO and County were awarded over $2,700,000$4,300,000 for transit <br /> operating and capital expenses from federal and state grants. This total included assistance from <br /> the FTA Section 5303 (planning), 5307 (operating and capital), 5310 (paratransit) and 5311 <br /> (rural pubic transportation) programs and the state Public Transportation Block Grant, <br /> Intermodal Grant, Service Development Grant, and-Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund <br /> programs, and Indian River County. <br /> External Costs <br /> Included in each MPO Long Range Transportation Plan are projected costs related to <br /> construction, operation, and maintenance of proposed roadway facilities over a 25-year period. <br /> Not all of the costs of the transportation system, however, are considered in the long range plan. <br /> Costs which are the indirect result of a project or activity areknown by economists as <br /> externalities. <br /> With respect to transportation, externalities are the costs generated by automobile travel, but paid <br /> for by sources other than gas taxes and transportation impact fees. Taken together, the cost of <br /> externalities may exceed the actual cost of building and maintaining roadways. Externalities <br /> Community Development Department Indian River County 69 <br /> APPENDIX A-Transportation Amendments <br />