Laserfiche WebLink
significantly increase capacity for both segments; however, those projects are not anticipated to be <br />undertaken for some time beyond the allowed 3 year "funded for construction" window for <br />counting future roadway capacity for concurrency purposes. In the case of CR 510, FDOT is <br />undertaking a massive $80+ million widening project from CR 512 to US 1 and that project, due to <br />its scale and cost, will take several years to complete and may be constructed in phases. In the case <br />of 37th Street, an alternative capacity producing project involving the extension of Aviation Blvd to <br />37th Street and to 41St Street is being pursued as a better alternative to 4-laning 37th Street. The <br />Aviation Blvd. extension project will require right-of-way acquisition and will take several years to <br />complete. <br />Since those two roadway projects will be undertaken beyond the 3 year window, an interim measure <br />level of service of D + 20% is proposed for those roadway segments, with a reverter clause for those <br />segments to be re -adjusted to LOS D after the planned roadway improvement projects are complete. <br />For CR 510, this means adjusting the LOS from 880 peak hour, peak season, peak direction trips to <br />945 peak hour, peak season, peak direction trips between 66th Avenue and 58th Avenue and to 1109 <br />peak hour, peak season, peak direction trips between 58th Avenue and U.S. Highway 1. For 37th <br />Street this means adjusting the LOS from 880 peak hour, peak season, peak direction trips to 992 <br />peak hour, peak season, peak direction trips between U.S. Highway 1 and Indian River Boulevard. <br />At completion of the planned improvements for both roadway segments, available capacity will <br />exceed conditions under the interim D +20% thresholds. <br />As proposed, the revision to Policy 3.5 will allow the County to continue to approve development <br />proposals that would impact either or both of the roadways, recognizing that any added trips to <br />those roadways from such development completed in the future would soon be addressed by the <br />planned roadway projects. <br />Policy 1.12 <br />For Policy 1.12 of the CIE, a minor typographical error for a referenced year will be corrected. No <br />substantive change is proposed for this policy. <br />Text Edits <br />With respect to concurrency related text edits, those proposed edits will exempt individual single <br />family permits from concurrency review. Current County regulations exempt building permits for <br />single-family homes on lots within subdivisions that existed prior to adoption of the Comprehensive <br />Plan in 1990. The proposed amendment will treat all single family permits equally. Under the <br />amendment, traffic impacts from individual homes will be tracked in the aggregate and anticipated <br />trips from single-family permits will be included in development project traffic studies to ensure <br />proper evaluation of impacts. Aggregate impacts will also be evaluated by staff each year in its <br />evaluation and review of the CIE and the 5 year capital improvement program schedule. The <br />proposed text revisions will simplify the building permit process for individual single family <br />permits, making the process consistent for all single family permits regardless of location, while at <br />the same time tracking and accounting for anticipated impacts. In the future, these text changes will <br />need to be reflected in an update to the LDR Chapter 910 concurrency regulations. <br />498 <br />