Laserfiche WebLink
Element <br />Policy #, <br />Objective #, <br />Text <br />Summary <br />Page <br /># <br />What the change is <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />LOS alternatives for roadways <br />exceeding LOS "D" <br />95 <br />Added segments of CR 510 and 37th <br />Street as LOS D +20% <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.7.2 — 2030 Needs Plan <br />103 — <br />Replaced 2030 Needs Plan <br />Improvements <br />105 <br />Improvements table with 2040 Needs <br />Plan Improvements table. <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.8A — Capital Revenues by <br />115 <br />Updated with new table from 2040 <br />Planning Horizon <br />LRTP <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.8B — Operating and <br />116 <br />Updated with new table from 2040 <br />Maintenance Revenues by Planning <br />LRTP <br />Horizon <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.9.1 — Improvements and <br />116 — <br />Updated with "2040 Needs Projects" <br />Needed Right -of -Way <br />125 <br />table from 2040 LRTP <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.9.2 — Highway Evaluation <br />125- <br />Updated with new table from 2040 <br />Table <br />126 <br />LRTP <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.9.3 — Cost Affordable <br />126 — <br />Updated with new table from 2040 <br />Projects Listing <br />128 <br />LRTP <br />Transportation <br />Text <br />Table 4.9.4 Programmed Capital <br />129 — <br />Removed outdated table. <br />Improvement Projects <br />135 <br />ANALYSIS <br />Nineteen (19) policies, 1 objective, and various texts of non -policy sections in the two elements of <br />the county's comprehensive plan are proposed to be revised. The proposed changes are shown in <br />st�-i� gn=u and underline format (attachment #4) and analyzed below. <br />• Capital Improvements Element Policies 3.5, 1.12, and Concurrency related text edits <br />Policy 3.5 <br />Planning staff, in conjunction with Public Works staff, have requested that Policy 3.5 of the Capital <br />Improvements Element, and a related policy in the Transportation Element (discussed under the <br />Transportation Element Policy subsection of this analysis) be revised. The current Policy 3.5 <br />establishes a Level of Service Standard for traffic circulation for concurrency management purposes <br />as Level of Service D during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions on all TRIP funded '; <br />roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of two roads that <br />are set at E + 20% (27th Avenue from South county line to State Road 60 and 43`d Avenue from <br />Oslo Road to 16th Street). Those exceptions were instituted during the development boom of the <br />mid 2000's based upon a policy decision to not widen those roads to 4 lane facilities. No changes <br />are proposed to those two exceptions. <br />Currently, there are two additional roadway segments within the County's concurrency <br />management system that are experiencing or will soon experience capacity issues at LOS D. Those <br />are County Road 510 from 66th Avenue to US Highway 1 and 37th Street from US Highway 1 to <br />Indian River Boulevard. In both instances, roadway improvement projects are planned to <br />48 7 <br />