My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/24/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
1/24/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:09 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dan Chastain, manager of assessment projects, gave a brief <br />overview of Phase VI of the Water Expansion Plan which will serve <br />a portion of Vero Lake Estates and Dixie Heights, together with <br />some adjoining properties (portions of Dixie Gardens). The total <br />project will serve 1580 lots owned by 1209 parcel identification <br />numbers. The total project cost is estimated at $2,903,410.11, <br />less a non -assessed transmission main cost of $387,664.26, for a <br />total assessment cost on the project of $2,515,745.85, equating to <br />a cost per square foot of .159061 cents. The project will be paid <br />through the assessments of the benefiting property owners and, in <br />the interim, with financing through the use of impact fee funds. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, that the Board adopt Resolution <br />95-17 providing for Phase VI of the Water Main <br />Extension Growth Plan; <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Bird again raised the issue of <br />the interest rate charged residents who pay assessments on a <br />_deferred basis. He felt the interest rate at 2% above prime is a <br />little high to charge people who are obviously already having a <br />difficult financial problem and wondered if the County might be <br />able to lower the rate somewhat. He suggested perhaps using a <br />different formula but understood that administrative, collection <br />and other costs must be recovered. <br />OMB Director Joseph Baird responded by advising that the <br />interest rate at 2% above prime was a policy decision which was <br />based on the County's cost of money. Director Baird also wanted <br />the Board to be aware that the County does not charge for recording <br />the liens or other incidental expenses related to these items. He <br />felt it is reasonable to charge 10.5%, which is 2% above prime. He <br />also reminded the Board that the residents are being charged a <br />fixed rate, rather than a variable rate, which is also a benefit. <br />Commissioner Adams iterated that the Board does not want to <br />get into competition with banks and stated that she felt each <br />project should be tied to something measurable which gives the <br />County some basis to compare costs. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired as to what kind of cost the County <br />would pay today to borrow funds. <br />Director Baird responded there would be an issuance cost of <br />about another $100,000, plus underwriter fees, discounts and fees <br />for bond counsel. His estimate was that the cost would be about <br />8%, plus $100,000, depending on the size of the project. <br />JANUARY 24, 1995 56 BOOK 94 PAGE X87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.