Laserfiche WebLink
r s � <br />Purpose and Function. <br />The purpose of the Committee was to examine and review the <br />Occupational License Ordinance, Chapter 207 of the Code of Ordinance <br />of Indian River County, regarding classifications and rate structure, <br />and to recommend revisions to such classifications and rate structure <br />for the occupational license. The Committee was to be gulded by the <br />following objectives in formulating its recommendations: <br />(1) The Committee shall review the businesses, <br />professions, and occupations within each classification and recommend <br />any reclassifications or new classifications. <br />(2) The Committee shall recommend a classification for any <br />business activity not currently paying an occupational license tax. <br />(3) The Committee shall review the rates of each <br />classification, and recommend any fee changes necessary to establish <br />equity between the rates for such classification. <br />After considering objectives (1) through (3) above, tite Committee was <br />directed to propose a rate structure that would not generate a decrease <br />In revenues. It was determined that the target revenue goal would be <br />approximately $140,000.00. <br />Under the guidelines given to the Committee by the Board of County <br />Commissioners, the County will collect an occupational license tax only <br />for businesses located in the unincorporated area and there will be no <br />distribution to the municipalities of taxes collected. <br />Committee Deliberation <br />Tile Committee met on six separate occasions with County staff and the <br />Tax Collector and his staff. One of the major problems was to <br />determine the loss of revenue that would result from not Issuing county <br />occupational. tax license In the incorporated areas of the County. In <br />addition, an attempt was made to determine the actual number of <br />licenses that would be Issued under the new procedures; however, this <br />was not possible with the data available. <br />After much debate, the Committee reached a consensus that a single fee <br />for each business would be the most equitable approach. This In effect <br />restricted the Committee, by statute, to a maximum tax of a 200% <br />increase in the current minimum tax of $14.00 ($42.00) . It shall be <br />noted that this revised tax may, by statute, be increased only by 5% <br />every other year. <br />Relying on figures provided by County staff, it was estimated that <br />approximately 4000 licenses would be Issued. Initially, the Committee' <br />was allocating to collection cost 2% of the money collected; however, the <br />Tax Collector did a study and concluded that 2% was not sufficient to <br />cover cost. The Committee feels that ail Increase to 10% of the money <br />collected would be appropriate for the tax collection. In light of this <br />Information, a single fee of $40.00 was selected. <br />Inasmuch as a single fee is being proposed classifications of businesses <br />Is no longer necessary. <br />The current ordinance has exemptions for certain activities (e.g., <br />banking and insurance) that are not exemptions under Chapter 205, <br />F.S. Tile Committee feels that except for minors tinder 18 the only <br />exemptions should be those set forth in Chapter 205, F.S. <br />Currently, Independent sales representatives (Avon, Amway, <br />Tupperware, etc.) are not licensed In the County. The Committee feels <br />that these persons should be required to be licensed. <br />With respect to Flea Markets, the Committee feels that the owner of the <br />flea market should be licensed and each person selling from a stall <br />should be licensed.. <br />FEBRUARY 7, 1995 30 <br />