My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:16:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From our knowledge of the area, there is no present justification <br />for the proposed Phase VI water expansion in this area. If the <br />County water system needs more customers to be economically sound, <br />there must be other areas that can be better served. Here, the <br />lots of Ro-Ed Corporation, which represent a substantial part of <br />the total to be served, are not even on the market; and there is no <br />present demand for water from those lots. There are also many <br />other lots within this same area that are not being used and that <br />will not be used in the foreseeable future. <br />Thank you for considering this statement. <br />Sincerely, <br />��Chester`�m�'' <br />Paul Madison, 89th St. & 102nd Ct., was not in favor of the <br />plan since he already has a water softener, R/O system, and two <br />wells. He preferred to have other county services, especially <br />drainage. <br />Carol Capola, 7950 93rd Ave., spoke against the plan, but felt <br />the area needed proper drainage. (It was determined she was not in <br />the project area.) <br />John Bailey, 9255 103rd Ave., north of Ro-ed property; said he <br />already has good water; needs drainage. <br />Howard Walker, 8306 93rd Avenue, owner of 17 lots, said it <br />would be a financial hardship and was not in favor of the plan. <br />Walter Hearn, 8365 93rd Ave., presented a petition with over <br />550 signatures and asserted that a majority of the residents in <br />Vero Lake Estates were not in favor of the plan because of the <br />prohibitive cost to the property owners. <br />We the under signed residents of Nero lake Estates strongly <br />oppose the proposed resolution relating to a SPECIAL ASSESSMENT <br />(RECEIPT OF PETITIONS IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. PETITIONS HAVE <br />BEEN RETURNED TO MR. WALTER HEARN.) <br />Duke Oster, IRC Utilities Department project engineer, advised <br />that they had closely coordinated the proposed project with Public <br />Works Director Jim Davis who had agreed to hold up on the drainage <br />0 <br />project for that area until the water line installation was <br />completed using Public Works' plans. <br />Walter Reed, of 101st Court, declared that he and his wife are <br />disabled and were not in favor of the plan because they could not <br />afford the assessment. <br />23 <br />February 21, 1995 hoof, 94F;1e ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.