My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:16:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 94 P,�Ua 399 <br />Richard Cook, 9075 104th Avenue, wondered why all of Vero Lake <br />Estates was not included. He was not in favor of the project since <br />his assessment, based on square footage, would be $13,857.39 and he <br />has only one house. <br />George Ireland, owner of 10 acres had received a notice of a <br />$28,000 assessment, read a letter of protest from his neighbors on <br />104th Street. He advised that he bought his property with plans to <br />retire but was just about getting taxed out. <br />February 13;1995 <br />Dear_ Commissioners <br />We the undersigned;who are the owners of the six five acre <br />parcels,in the area known as Less Pine Lakes Estates,located on the <br />western edge of the proposed Water Expansion Plan Phase VI for Vero <br />Lakes Estates Units H1,H2(see enclosed map);are writing this letter <br />to voice our -strenuous objection to being included in with Vero <br />Lakes Estates,in the said project. <br />Firstly,0ur respective_5 acre parcels are located on west side <br />of 104th Av.(an unmaintained road),between 89th and 92 street.They <br />are all zoned agricultural, and in fact are used as such,either for <br />pasturing livestock or raising ornamental plants.We all have small <br />lakes with circulated water,fed by deep flow wells.in addition <br />there are various shallow wells on each property.We don't need an <br />additional water source. <br />Secondly,You must acknowledge we do not share the problems <br />that the owners of lots in the Vero Lakes Estates face,which on the <br />average have 70 -feet of street frontage.Unlike these lots we have <br />no fear of our drinking water being contaminated by a neighbors <br />septic system or we in turn contaminating theirs. <br />Thirdly,The proposed assessment of our five acre lots is <br />absurd .There is only one occupied living dwelling permitted on <br />each property;thus we can consume no more water than an individual <br />lot owner in Vero Lake Estates.At the very most,we should be only <br />assessed the same as the lots across the street. <br />Fourthly,There are only five families living on the whole <br />length of 104.ave where the water line is proposed to go. <br />Collectively the undersigned vehemently object to being <br />included irr Water Expansion Plan;and wish our properties to be <br />excluded from the project. <br />Respectfully, <br />Stephen Mueller <br />Ann Ritter ` <br />George I rel and %7-1 �_—+�►/'� <br />Richard Cook"r-� <br />Sharon Kinchen <br />`1 <br />Pe- A , 1.-.` r - /LC e. <br />�`��•a.fk �- 2©e�f�lC�i2 Gtr C�. i'ILI <br />RC1 f 1 rc <br />24 <br />February 21, 1995 <br />/ G_ j 1 J_ l L[_L <br />✓L CS'L <br />e s !Lt LG1 --/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.