My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:16:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
800K 94 PAA 409 <br />Director Dean advised that just about a week and a half ago he <br />received the proposed lease agreement and, because he was unaware <br />of the lease, called IRFWCD and was told we could "take it or leave <br />it". Since the cable provides us with a very good service and use, <br />staff is recommending approval of the agreement. <br />Commissioner Adams asserted that, because of the continued <br />right-of-way charges, the practice should be discontinued and other <br />alternatives investigated. She believed the fiber optic cable <br />route should be re-evaluated and relocated on County right-of-way. <br />She remarked that it was County taxpayers' dollars that would be <br />paying this rent and she could not support the agreement. <br />Chairman Macht believed it might be time to meet with the <br />IRFWCD Board to discuss these types of issues. <br />Commissioner Tippin believed governmental committees ought to <br />cooperate and save money to benefit the taxpayers. <br />Director Dean advised he had posed that argument when he spoke <br />with John Amos who had indicated that it was for right-of-way <br />maintenance. Director Dean had countered that the County could mow <br />it at least twice a year cheaper than this, if that's what they <br />needed. His negotiation attempts were unsuccessful. <br />Administrator Chandler recalled this agreement was only a part <br />of it, that they had had meetings last year, and there were several <br />agreements on last week's agenda to accommodate utility lines. <br />Commissioner Tippin concluded it would be legitimate if there <br />were administrative expenses on their part caused by the pipes or <br />wires, but just renting the property was a different situation. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if Director Dean could bring back an <br />alternate route as well as costs for same. <br />Director Dean explained that he could contact the people who <br />laid the cable for a proposal for a new route and associated costs, <br />but he believed it would be very expensive. <br />Commissioner Adams asked if cost was not discussed initially. <br />Director Dean recalled the only cost mentioned was the permitting <br />fee, which was taken care of, and some argument about where the <br />cables would be on their right-of-way, but he never heard anything <br />about a lease or maintenance agreement. <br />Commissioner Adams wondered what would be done next year when <br />they came in and wanted $5,000. She suggested we bite the bullet, <br />put it on County property, and let it be a lesson learned not to <br />use anybody else's right-of-way. <br />Chairman Macht thought we could do that and Director Dean <br />acknowledged we'd have to cross their property in some areas since <br />34 <br />February 21, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.