My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/28/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
2/28/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:17:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The following alternatives are presented: <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Approve a contract addendum with American Coastal <br />Engineering in the amount of $15,850. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Direct staff to solicit proposals from qualified <br />surveyors pursuant to CCNA procedures. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Staff recommends that the Board approve a contract addendum with <br />American Coastal Engineering in the amount of $15,850. Funding to <br />be from Tourist Tax Development Revenues. <br />Coastal Engineer Don Donaldson presented the alternatives to <br />the Board and advised that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is <br />prepared to issue a permit once they have received a letter of no <br />objection from the State Historical Officer. A ship wreck from <br />1715 has been identified in the Rio Mar area and there is a concern <br />that relics may be buried beneath the proposed PEP reef. The <br />Division of Historical Resources is requiring that a professional <br />magnetometer survey be conducted in the project area prior to any <br />related bottom disturbance activities. The cost of this survey is <br />$15,850. We are also required to have an archeologist on board <br />during the survey. <br />Commissioner Adams advised the good news that the final <br />application has been hand delivered to DEP and we should get an <br />answer one way or the other within 90 days. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired about the schedule and wondered if <br />the Board will have an opportunity to have a presentation that will <br />explain all of the facets of the project as he feels he has been <br />getting mixed signals from various areas. <br />Commissioner Adams also felt it would be a good idea to have <br />an updated presentation. She noted that a public workshop has been <br />scheduled for March 16 as a part of the public hearing and that the <br />total project will be explained and questions answered. She felt <br />the mixed signals have been put out to the public to discredit the <br />project. The design of the PEP reef has been based on the Palm <br />Beach reef, and she advised she will attempt to schedule a <br />presentation for the public. <br />aou 94 Pvi,L 486 <br />FEBRUARY 28, 1995 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.