Laserfiche WebLink
None of the alignments considered are projected to result in a significantly <br />increased or reduced environmental impact relative to one another. The <br />"No -Build" alternative will not result in any environmental impacts along the <br />corridor. <br />5.4 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS <br />Alignment C (right -side widening) is identified to be the preferred corridor. <br />Alignment C results in the maximizing utilization of the existing roadway <br />rights-of-way, eliminates impacts to franchise utilities and results in the <br />lowest projected right-of-way acquisition costs. <br />5.5 COSTS <br />The following table summarizes the projected total cost associated with the <br />Preferred Alignment. <br />Table 4: Preferred Alignment Total Project Cost <br />Preferred <br />Alignment <br />Segments <br />Estimated <br />Construction <br />Cost <br />Estimated <br />Right -of -Way <br />Acquisition Cost <br />Estimated FPL <br />Relocation Cost <br />Estimated Total <br />Project Cost <br />Alignment C <br />$ 1,396,000 <br />$ 167,000 <br />$ 0 <br />,x'4563,000 <br />The Preferred Alignment is projected to result in the most efficient <br />utilization of the Counties capital investment. <br />5.6 CONCLUSION <br />Based upon the alternative alignments evaluated Alignment C is <br />recommended to comprise the Preferred Alignment for the following <br />reasons: <br />• Addresses the long-range planning and safety objectives set <br />forth by the County. <br />Kimley»>Horn 172 <br />