Laserfiche WebLink
4. Current recurring costs <br />5. New recurring costs <br />Continuing Class B <br />Convert to Class AA <br />6. Subtract 4 from 5 <br />$36,000,000 <br />$30,000,000 - $60,000,000 <br />$60,000,000 + $36,000,000 <br />$30,000,000 - $40,000,000 <br />$60,000,000 to continue Class B <br />$30,000,000 - $40,000,000 to shift to <br />Class AA <br />7. Number of times costs will recur in 5 years 5 <br />8. Multiply 6 times 7 $300,000,000 to continue Class B <br />$150,000,000 - $200,000,000 to shift to <br />Class AA <br />$310,000,000 to continue Class B <br />$450.000.000 - $600,000,000 to shift to <br />Class AA <br />If 9. is greater than $1 million, there is likely an increase of regulatory costs in excess <br />of $1 million, and the rule must be submitted to the legislature for ratification. <br />D. Good faith estimates (numbers/types): <br />1. The number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule. <br />(Please provide a reasonable explanation for the estimate used forthe number of individuals and methodology <br />used for deriving the estimate). <br />• Approximately 125 site permittees (number is slightly less because some <br />permittees have multiple sites) <br />• 125 agricultural land owners (ranches, farms, etc.) <br />• 127 domestic wastewater, treatment facilities <br />• 9 biosolids treatment facilities <br />• 46 septage management facilities <br />Unknown number of biosolids haulers (approximately 6 — 12, as there is <br />some duplication with the site permittees). DEP does not permit haulers. <br />2. A general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. <br />Entities currently involved with the land application of biosolids will be directly <br />affected by the new rule - site permittees, the land owners of sites, facilities <br />and utilities currently sending biosolids for land application, and biosolids <br />transporters. <br />143 <br />