My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/2019 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2019
>
11/19/2019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2020 10:25:07 AM
Creation date
3/20/2020 10:21:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/19/2019
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. Good faith estimates (costs): <br />1. Cost to the department of implementing the proposed rule: <br />® None. The department intends to implement the proposed rule within its <br />current workload, with existing staff. <br />❑ M i n i m a l. (Provide a brief explanation). <br />❑ Other. (Please provide a reasonable explanation for the estimate used <br />and methodology used for deriving the estimate). <br />2. Cost to ainy other state and local government entities of implementing the <br />proposed rule: <br />❑ None. This proposed rule will only affect the department. <br />❑ Minimal. (Provide a brief explanation). <br />Z Oth e r. (Please provide a reasonable explanation for the estimate used and methodology used for <br />deriving the estimate). <br />The majority of biosolids are generated by utilities owned and operated by <br />local government entities. Therefore, estimates for one-time capital costs <br />and recurring costs will primarily affect local governments entities. This <br />includes,127 domestic wastewater treatment facilities that treat and land <br />apply biosolids, 9 biosolids treatment facilities that land apply biosolids, an <br />unknown but significant number of small wastewater treatment facilities <br />that send biosolids to larger treatment facilities, and biosolids treatment <br />facilities that treat and land apply biosolids. Not included are utilities <br />potentially indirectly affected by the increasing costs of biosolids <br />management resulting from increased demand on management options <br />other than land application (e.g. landfill tipping fees, Class AA biosolids <br />treatment facilities, etc.) <br />3. Cost to the department of enforcing the proposed rule: <br />® None. The department intends to enforce the proposed rule within its <br />current workload with existing staff. <br />❑ Minimal. (Provide a brief explanation). <br />❑ Other. (Please -provide a reasonable explanation for the estimate used and methodology used for <br />deriving the estimate). <br />144 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.