Laserfiche WebLink
HUMANE SOCIETY FUNDING REQUEST <br />Administrator Chandler reviewed the memorandum of March 8, <br />1995: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 8, 1995 FILE: <br />SUBJECT: Humane Society Funding <br />Request <br />FROM: mes E. Chandler REFERENCES: <br />/County Administrator <br />As a result of the fiscal constraints, funding allocation to non-profit <br />organizations for FY 94/95 were held to the same level as the prior year. The <br />Humane Society had requested a $106,000 increase from $127,000 to $233,000. <br />During the various budget sessions the Humane Society presented and explained <br />the basis for their budget request. Although the funding remained the same, <br />the Board provided that any dog license revenue, in FY 94/95, beyond the <br />$13,000 projected would be allocated to the Humane Society. The new law <br />became effective this fiscal year and the revenue projection was believed to be <br />very conservative. As of March 2nd, the revenue from dog licenses was <br />$11,708. If collections continue at the current rate, total revenue may reach <br />$27,300, which would be an additional $14,300 to the Humane Society. <br />Additionally, staff was to meet with the Humane Society with an objective of <br />developing a formula that could be used as the basis for FY 95/96 and <br />subsequent annual allocations. The recommendations were to be presented to the <br />Board prior to formulation of the FY 95/96 budget requests. <br />Staff has met on a number of occasions with Joan Carlson and various <br />Humane Society representatives since November. In the process they provided <br />data and information regarding their programs, revenue and expenses. As a <br />result, staff concurs that an increased allocation is justified and establishing a <br />unit price per animal would be a reasonable basis for future allocations. <br />However, we have not been able to arrive at mutual agreement on a first year <br />unit price. <br />The Humane Society had advised that $40 per animal was the minimum first <br />year requirement. Based on the actual number of animals received in FY 93/94 <br />(6,039) the current year $127,000 allocation equates to $21.09 per animal. The <br />$40 per animal would amount to an increase of $114,560 (90.2%) next fiscal year <br />and would be the initial base amount that future allocations would be predicated <br />on. The number of animals and an escalator would be applied to that unit price <br />for future allocations. <br />In considering that requested unit price, staff analyzed the Humane Society <br />expenses and revenues from FY 89/90 through the current years budget ( Exhibit <br />I) . For that period, shelter and administrative expenses increased by $166,347 <br />(55.59%) and $43,365 (63.87%) respectively for a total of $209,712 (57.12%). <br />Initial cost analysis presented by the Humane Society to arrive at a per animal <br />cost incorporated both areas and has since been modified to include only shelter <br />expenses. Correspondingly, the current county animal control budget of <br />61 <br />March 14, 1995 Bw 94 PAa 608. <br />