Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 94 Fpaft <br />Chairman Macht asked if it was totally impractical to try to <br />recover some of the costs from the owners of animals and <br />Administrator Chandler advised of current redemption and "penalty" <br />fees and a resultant income of approximately $6,000. Over a year <br />ago, staff presented the possibility of increasing the fees, making <br />a greater penalty for multiple offenders, but the Board felt that <br />if the increases were too much, there was a possibility people <br />would not claim the animals. It remains an alternative. <br />Chairman Macht summarized that it was the taxpayer who had to <br />pay for irresponsible citizens, to the tune of nearly a half a <br />million dollars for animal control. Administrator Chandler pointed <br />out there was only a 7.4% increase ($209,000 current budget) in the <br />Animal Control operating expense. <br />Commissioner Adams observed that the number of animals had <br />remained rather constant and it seemed to her they should be paid <br />at least at cost for the mandatory five days, because if the Humane <br />Society was to not do it, then the County was looking at a greater <br />responsibility/ cost for animal care. Money was the only issue; she <br />did not know the solution. <br />OMB Director Joe Baird explained that he was recommending, <br />based on their 1993/94 audited numbers, to increase the fee to <br />$30/animal which should bring them to a break-even situation. He <br />continued that it is a difficult situation because the County is <br />not experiencing a growth of revenues either, yet the expense <br />demands continue. It was a tough decision to even recommend a <br />$55,000 increase when other agencies were not increased. <br />Commissioner Bird summarized the complicated situation, that <br />staff was recommending that the FY 95/96 year allocation be <br />increased by $55,073, to bring the cost per animal up to $30.15 <br />even though the Humane Society is saying their basic cost of <br />providing services to animals for the County is around $40. He <br />understood the Humane Society is asking that the $40/animal figure <br />be attained within a certain prescribed number of budget years or <br />time, and staff is saying it was very difficult to guarantee that <br />because of budget unknowns. If everyone could agree that <br />$40/animal is a reasonable figure to strive to attain, then we will <br />work towards attaining that goal. While we cannot commit to <br />reaching that goal in one year or two years, we would work together <br />to try to attain it. <br />Commissioner Eggert and Chairman Macht agreed with <br />Commissioner Bird's summarization and that a future budget <br />commitment could not be made. <br />64 <br />March 14, 1995 <br />