My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/28/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
3/28/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:10 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D(HIBIT'A' <br />Cost model for Contractor being able to substantiate only 50% of extended time. <br />Assumptions: Contractor overhead cost 545,000/mo. <br />or $1,475/day <br />320 days over contract time <br />180 days justified by Contractor <br />180 days liquidated damages awarded to County <br />180 x 3,050 <br />488,000 <br />Total awarded to County <br />Less <br />100x$1,475= <br /><238.000> <br />Extended General Conditions awarded to Contractor <br />252,000 <br />Less <br />180 x 1000 a <br /><180,000> <br />Project Manager's extended General Conditions per contract <br />92,000 <br />Less <br />180 x 550 = <br /><88,000> <br />Architect/Engineem extended cost per contract <br />$4.000 <br />Plus <br />County would retain from Architect/Engineer for cost of errors <br />55.000 <br />and omissions <br />0• <br />Net to County <br />• This amount would not begin to cover the cost to the County to arbitrate this issue with the Contractor. <br />This cost model is based only on the Contractor substantiating 1/2 of the extended time. If he should <br />be able to prove more time, this could easily result in a net immediate cash out lay by the County. <br />[IV <br />MARCH 28, 1995 <br />BOOK 94 FA,,,,L 731 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.