Laserfiche WebLink
years of negotiations with their insurance company to no avail. She advised <br />that her consistent efforts to keep the property safe and in compliance have <br />been hindered by squatters and thieves, despite the trespass notices affixed <br />to the building. She stated that she has hired a contractor to begin the <br />rehabilitation process of the building. � <br />02:10:00 <br />ON MOTION BY Mr. Bruce Redus, SECONDED <br />by Mr. Joe Petrulak, the Board voted <br />unanimously (5-0) to table discussion on case <br />#2016060187 until after case #2014070124 is <br />heard. <br />Mr. Andy Sobczak informedhe1Board that the`case\ending is 0124 <br />related to overgrown weeds and internl,property maintenance violations that <br />originally came before them on August-26;k201,,4cand had some overlap with <br />the case ending in 0187. (After, one extension,/a $100 per day fine was <br />imposed on November 22, 201.4. whecomplianwas not met. Compliance <br />was verified 1,849 days lateron.nDececompliance was <br />15,`2019 for a flat accrued fine of <br />$184,900 with administrative cost being $2,000\ <br />Mr. Andy Som bczak advised `, <br />that the BCC discussed condemnation of <br />the Subject Property at their last meeting/but tabled'it until their February 18, <br />2020 meeting pending the Coutcome\of this board. He stressed that the <br />prope ty has-been significantly cleaned *and is currently in compliance. The <br />Board discussed the shortage of affordable housing as well as the hardships <br />fa e�d(by the Respondent•ir relation to.this Subject Property. <br />02:15:30 <br />ON MOTION BY Mr. Joe Petrulak, to <br />acknowledge; compliance and reduce the fine for <br />both'cases to $9314 which is ten percent of the <br />accessed market value of the Subject Property. <br />There `vvas no second to this motion and it failed. <br />02:17:50 <br />ON MOTION BY Mr. Pete Clements, SECONDED <br />by Mr. Joe Petrulak, the Board voted <br />unanimously (5-0) to acknowledge compliance <br />and reduce the fine to combined administrative <br />costs of the two cases for a total of $4,300. <br />104 <br />