Laserfiche WebLink
Boos 94 PAUU 782 <br />AMALYS7S <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; <br />• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For rezoning requestsp conditional concurrency review is <br />required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district. <br />The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as <br />follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: <br />2. Existing Zoning Classification: <br />3. Proposed Zoning Classification: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed <br />Zoning Classification: <br />- Transportation <br />±13.3 acres <br />A-1, Agricultural <br />District (up to 1 unit/5 <br />acres) <br />RM -8, Multiple -Family <br />Residential' District (up <br />to 8 units/acre) <br />2 single-family units <br />106 single-family units. <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service "D" or better on S.R. 60 would not be lowered. The site <br />information used for determining traffic is as follows: <br />APRIL 49 1995 34 <br />