Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 9 PGS <br />- Drainage <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater <br />regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of <br />floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge <br />requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. The <br />subject property is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the <br />Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD). Since the site <br />is located within the IRFWCD, development on the property will be <br />prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in <br />a 24 hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service <br />standards do not apply, since the property does not lie within a <br />floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge <br />standards do apply. With the most intense use of this site under <br />the proposed zoning, the maximum area of impervious surface will be <br />approximately 405,544 square feet, or 9.3 acres. The maximum <br />runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the <br />25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch <br />discharge requirement, will be approximately 411,820 cubic feet. <br />In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the <br />applicant will be required to retain approximately 315,262 cubic <br />feet of runoff on-site. Considering the soils characteristic of <br />the subject property, staff estimates that the pre -development <br />runoff rate is 75 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service <br />standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the <br />IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in 24 hours, and <br />requiring retention of 315,262 cubic feet of runoff for the most <br />intense use of the property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted <br />during the development approval process. <br />- Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand <br />that would result from the most intense development that could <br />occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification <br />indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. <br />The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated <br />with the proposed development of the property and the existing <br />surplus acreage by park type. <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all <br />concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid <br />waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning. Therefore, the concurrency test has- been_ <br />satisfied for the subject request. <br />APRIL 4, 1995 40 <br />s <br />LOS <br />Project <br />.-JAcres per <br />Demand <br />Surplus <br />Park Type <br />1000 population) <br />Acres <br />Acreage <br />Urban District <br />5.0 <br />1.22 <br />189.844 <br />Community (north) <br />3.0 <br />0.73 <br />19.843 <br />Beach <br />1.5 <br />0.37 <br />67.353 <br />River <br />1.5 <br />0.37 <br />28.350 <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all <br />concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid <br />waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning. Therefore, the concurrency test has- been_ <br />satisfied for the subject request. <br />APRIL 4, 1995 40 <br />s <br />