4/24/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

INCIDENT #1: On September 20, 1994, John King, your supervisor, conducted an employee consultation with you (Exhibit A) regarding your unacceptable change in work habits and poor work performance. He explained to you the specific instances where you have fallen short as well as the areas requiring improvement. You were also noticed that continued failure to correct the problem would result in more severe disciplinary action. You acknowledged that your work performance was below your potential and indicated that you would improve both your attitude and performance. FINDING: The record is uncontested that the employee consultation occurred and that you admitted your performance was below your potential and you agreed to improve both your attitude and performance. INCIDENT #2: On September 21, 1994, John King, your supervisor, discussed with you your failure to accomplish a routine office task (Exhibit I) he had reminded you about the prior day relating to outgoing correspondence which you stated you had forgotten about. You had been warned about this same type of unsatisfactory work performance the prior day and yet it recurred the very next day. FINDING: It was established that you did fail to complete a routine office task related to outgoing correspondence, a simple task which you had been counseled about the day prior by your supervisor. Your response was that you forgot to accomplish this routine function. INCIDENT #3: On October 41 1994, John King, your supervisor, counseled with you (Exhibits L & M) regarding your failure to be at your work station at the assigned time. You voluntarily returned your office key to Administrative Secretary II Diane Albin on Monday, September 27, 1994, and waited outside the main entrance to the office on Tuesday and Wednesday even though there were other open entrances into the Administration Building. You were not at your work station at the assigned time and you had not received authorization from your supervisor to be absent from your duty station. Your stated excuse for not being at your work station was to "protect yourself." You were again warned by your supervisor that your attitude, poor job performance, and failure to be at your work station would result in further disciplinary action if improvement was not noted. FINDING: The record established at the hearing was that you returned your office key to Diane Albin and waited outside the office entrance on two days, failing to be at your assigned work station without authorization to be absent by your supervisor. It was also established that the main entrances to the building were open at 7:OOAM and you could have entered through any of these doors and been at your work station at the assigned time. Your stated excuse that you took this action to "protect yourself" is not acceptable, since no events were established with any basis at the hearing to support your reason for being absent from your duty station. You were again counseled by your supervisor about your job performance, attitude, and behavior with the warning that further demonstrations would result in more severe disciplinary action. INCIDENT #4: On October 24, 1994, John King, your supervisor, gave you a written warning and discussed in detail your continued poor job performance. You were advised that you constantly failed to demonstrate the initiative to attempt -any project without an explicit directive; you exhibit inattention to detail resulting in incorrectly filed correspondence; a lack of concern about making complete copies of outgoing correspondence; and a failure to keep 3 800K 94 FAGE ��4 April 24, 1995