Laserfiche WebLink
A TRUE COPY <br />CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE <br />J.R. SMITH, CLERK <br />required data in-house for the project. The project work; therefore, primarily consists of the assemblage <br />and interpretation of existing information, and the County anticipates using a consultant familiar with <br />the FRCP Grant projects to complete the work. <br />D. Explain how this project is addressing social vulnerability or vulnerability of historic resources <br />or stormwater management systems. The project will include public meetings that solicit <br />information from the general public, as well as from traditionally vulnerable communities in the <br />County. Historic and culturally significant resources will also be included in the project's threat matrix, <br />which is an output of the project's preliminary exposure analysis. <br />12. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OUTCOMES: As a result of this project, County assets, infrastructure, <br />and communities at risk of impacts from SLR and coastal flooding can be identified so that adaptation <br />strategies can be implemented during future community development and capital improvement planning. <br />In addition, the data generated from the vulnerability assessment will be used in future spatial analyses to <br />facilitate hazard mitigation planning, local mitigation strategy working group planning, and in the <br />development of land development regulations and comprehensive plan amendments. Spatial data outputs <br />will also enable the County to evaluate land use changes within urbanized areas that are potentially <br />impacted by SLR, track impacts to public assets and property values, and improve disaster preparedness. <br />An additional benefit of this project is that the vulnerability assessment and adaptation strategies developed <br />can be used to develop a County resiliency/adaptation plan as a future endeavor. <br />13. BUDGET SUMMARY: Allowable budget categories and form of payment with the costs for this <br />project are listed in the table below. <br />BUDGET SUMMARY BREAKDOWN <br />Budget Categories <br />Payment <br />Task 1 <br />Task 2 <br />Task 3 <br />Task 4 <br />Salaries & Fringe <br />Fixed Price <br />$2,068 <br />$1,034 <br />$11,034 <br />$1,034 <br />Contractual Services* <br />Fixed Price <br />$2,932 <br />$8,966 <br />$20,966 <br />$8,966 <br />GRANT AGREEMENT TOTAL <br />$5,000 <br />$10,000 <br />$22,000 <br />$10,000 <br />BUDGET SUMMARY BREAKDOWN <br />Budget Categories Payment <br />Task 5 <br />Task 6 <br />Grant Amount <br />Awarded <br />Salaries & Fringe Fixed Price <br />$2,068 <br />$1,034 <br />$8,272 <br />Contractual Services* Fixed Price <br />$5,932 <br />$18,966 <br />566,728 <br />GRANT AGREEMENT TOTAL <br />$8,000 1 <br />$20,000 <br />575,000 <br />A. Describe how the project costs was determined: The cost estimates included in this grant application <br />were derived from the review of previous successful FRCP grant applications for other jurisdictions, <br />and from consultation with local consultants familiar with this type of project. <br />B. Contractual Services Selection*: Upon a selected Sub -Contractors) (if applicable), the Grantee <br />will Provide a signed certification statement giving a description of the procurement process that was <br />utilized for the selection of the sub -contractors. The description must include: <br />a. What procurement process was utilized <br />Attachment 3, DEP Agreement #: R2114 <br />5of10 <br />Rev. 9/26/2019 <br />