My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/15/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
11/15/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2020 1:10:04 PM
Creation date
12/10/2020 12:13:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/15/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
367
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
expenditures. General government spending is the second largest spending category equal to about <br />24% of the total. <br />The county's pace of spending is expected to be in line with or marginally exceed revenue growth <br />trends, absent policy action, due to the need to meet the demands of an expanding population. <br />Employee wages and benefits are the main expenditure driver. Wages and benefits are collectively <br />bargained. County employees are largely represented by two unions; the county recently renewed <br />one of its contracts for a three-year term and is in negotiations with the other union. Under state <br />law, if impasse is declared, both parties are required to engage in a non-binding mediation <br />process after which the local government may impose contract terms for one year. <br />The county was able to manage the budget through the great recession by privatizing certain <br />services, implementing hiring and wage freezes and layoffs, and using reserves. It has since <br />increased staffing levels in recent years and reinstated pay increases; however, staffing levels are <br />still below prerecession levels and the county's high proportion of public safety spending may <br />present some practical restrictions on future expenditure flexibility. Fixed costs associated with. <br />debt and retiree liabilities are equal to about 10% of total government spending., <br />Long -Term Liability Burden <br />The county's long -tern liability burden is equal to less than 3% of personal income and is expected <br />to remain very low. The county's overall debt totals $145 million or about 1.5% of personal income <br />and mainly reflects the overlapping obligations of the county school board. The county's direct <br />debt amortizes at an aggressive pace with more than 90% of principal to be repaid within 10 years. <br />Capital needs are manageable and largely related to transportation and utility system improvements <br />financed from gas and sales tax revenues, impact fees, user fees and grants. The county does not <br />contemplate any additional debt issuance at the present time. County officials are seeking voter <br />approval to extend the existing sales tax levy for 15 years, upon its expiration in 2019. The tax levy <br />currently generates about $16 million annually; the county plans to continue to use the funds to <br />support its infi-astructure and capital. needs on a pay-as-you-go basis. <br />The county participates in the state -administered Florida Retirement System; a cost sharing <br />multiple employer pian. FRS is adequately funded with an asset to liability ratio estimated at 82%, <br />using a Fitch adjusted 7% discount rate. The county's net pension liability totaled $98 million as of <br />the most recent report. The county historically fiords 100% of the ARC. <br />Operating Performance <br />Fitch believes that the county's broad revenue raising ability and spending flexibility provide <br />it with the ability to maintain reserves well in excess of a level consistent with a'aaa' financial <br />resilience assessment through economic cycles. Fitch's Analytical Sensitivity Tool (FAST) <br />generates a general fund revenue decline of nearly 4% in a moderate economic downturn scenario. <br />Fitch believes that the county is well positioned to manage through economic cycles while <br />maintaining a high level of financial resilience, due to its financial reserve policy (unassigned <br />reserves equal to 20% of total operational spending), ample revenue raising ability and solid ability <br />to manage expenditures. <br />The county has demonstrated robust financial management by maintaining ample reserves. The <br />county chose to draw on fund balance to pay down its debt during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013. For <br />fiscal 2015, the county planned a $1.4 million drawdown of reserves, due to the expected use of <br />funds previously set aside for legal expenses. Despite the operating deficits that occurred in each <br />of these years, the county's unassigned reserve levels have remained in excess of 50% of total <br />expenditures (after transfers). The county has well-defined fund balance policies, which outline a <br />minimum unassigned fund balance equal, to 20% of budgeted operating spending. The county also <br />maintains a separate 5% reserve for both budget stabilization and emergency use. County officials <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.