Laserfiche WebLink
The critical path schedule for project completion in the- summer of 1995 is attached to this <br />letter. <br />We remain available to respond to any requests for information or to answer any questions <br />which may arise from this schedule. <br />Very truly yours; <br />AMERICAfiN COASTAL ENGINEERING, INC. <br />1 � <br />Beth L. Mitchell <br />Vice President <br />Enclosure : Critical Path Schedule <br />cc: Commissioner Fran Adams <br />Ms. Mitchell advised that if the County issued the Notice to <br />Proceed today, there would be no price increases for the year 1994- <br />95; however, if the project is delayed until next year, the <br />contract price would increase approximately 10%-12%. She suggested <br />a third option to the County was to issue a Partial Notice to <br />Proceed and the project would be done in increments. This would <br />give the contractor the ability to try to complete the project this <br />summer, depending on what unfolds in the administrative hearing <br />process. <br />Ms. Mitchell advised that they also are requesting a Partial <br />Notice to Proceed to mobilize. She explained that the first phase <br />includes putting bonds and insurance in place, modifying the forms, <br />and ordering some materials. After they complete that phase, they <br />would come back in 30 days and request a Notice to Proceed to <br />fabricate. If, during the next couple of months, they continue to <br />experience delays, the units would be fabricated. They may lose <br />the "window of installation" to actually get the units in the <br />water, but the units would be built, stored at no cost, and could <br />be installed next spring. <br />Ms. Mitchell asked the Board to make a decision whether they <br />wanted to install the project this summer and, if not, they would <br />be happy to come back next year. However, they would prefer to get <br />going now. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if the $200,000 to mobilize would be <br />lost and have to be paid again next year, and Ms. Mitchell <br />explained that it would not have to be paid again on that <br />mobilization cost. She went on to say that the second mobilization <br />cost actually had to do with installation of the units and if they <br />had to store the units, there would be a 10%-12% increase on that <br />portion, or roughly about $90,000. <br />!tri <br />May 23, 1995 Boa 95 ?Au 205 <br />