Laserfiche WebLink
Bo x 95 fAu206 <br />Chairman Macht asked staff's recommendation relative to Ms. <br />Mitchell's suggestion, and Mr. Donaldson responded that the <br />contract was not clear on the point, therefore, the contract would <br />need to be amended just for clarity. He estimated the costs for a <br />partial Notice to Proceed to include mobilization and fabrication <br />would be $890,000. A 10%-12% increase for installation next year <br />on the remaining portion of the project would ultimately add about <br />5% to the overall project total, instead of a 10%-12% increase if <br />they decide to wait on the entire project until next year. <br />Mr. Donaldson believed that the County Attorney might be able <br />to give information about the 120 hearing process and how to <br />proceed, and he recommended deferring until all appeals are over <br />before issuing any Notice to Proceed. <br />County Attorney Vitunac presented two scenarios: if we win the <br />appeals, and if the appeals are successful. There would be a <br />minimum of 30 days, probably longer, just to win the case, which <br />becomes a factor affecting the installation opportunity this <br />summer. If the appeals are successful against us and the permits <br />are withdrawn permanently, the units would have been built and <br />could not be put in place. He hasn't seen the challenges yet. <br />They may be invalid or have some merit, and he could give no <br />opinion of the odds. A decision to proceed or not was a "risk <br />analysis" of how important it is to have them made this summer <br />versus waiting. <br />Chairman Macht asked if the appellants had standing to file, <br />and County Attorney Vitunac said Frank Zorc was the only one he was <br />aware of. He explained the law required an appellant to be a <br />significantly affected party with the legal right and the right has <br />to be one that was affected by this permit, within the same <br />influence; thus, generally, beachfront owners within the area would <br />have standing. He advised they would look heavily into the <br />standing issue. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested that in environmental concerns <br />just about everybody has standing. <br />Commissioner Bird asked staff what additional cost might be <br />incurred if they did not issue the Notice to Proceed, but pursued <br />the final permits, and went through the 120 hearing process. <br />Mr. Donaldson was not sure of the legal expenses, but the cost <br />to wait until next year would be approximately 10% more. He hoped <br />the cost to reinvestigate the anomalies would be less than $5,000. <br />48 <br />May 23, 1995 <br />