My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/08/2020
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2020
>
12/08/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2021 1:26:14 PM
Creation date
1/29/2021 1:21:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/08/2020
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Hearings <br />Vice Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day read the following into the record: <br />A. Harbor Bluffs PD: The Virginia W. Russell Family Limited Partnership and <br />Segment Markets 85, Inc.'s Request to Rezone Approximately 78.29 Acres <br />from MED, Medical to PD, Planned Development and to Obtain Conceptual PD <br />Plan Approval for a Project to be known as Harbor Bluffs PD [PD -20-09-02 / <br />99040218-87279] [Public Hearing/Quasi-Judicial] <br />The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who <br />wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter. <br />I <br />Vice Chairperson Dr. Jonathan Day asked the Commissioners to reveal any <br />ex -parte communication with the applicant or any conflict that would not allow them <br />to make an unbiased decision. The members stated that they had not had any ex - <br />parte communication. <br />Mr. Ryan 7SN.eePey,viewed information regardi rth oposed site and <br />gave a PowerP ti n, p' o=ns <br />re o it the oard of County <br />Commissioners to t t r ommend that the <br />BCC approve t e PD rezo ing n conce #gat p n for rbour Bluffs with <br />conditions listed Staffs r p rt. <br />I <br />Ms. Mitchell questioned Staff about the reason that thesingle-family and <br />duplex units not being an allowable use within the MED zoning. Mr. Sweeney <br />stated that through the use table in the MED district there are allowable uses, <br />specifically multi -family that is allowed through the administrative permit approval <br />process that was approved in 2019. <br />Mr. Polackwich questioned if this property owner has the right to develop the <br />624 multi -family units. Mr. Sweeney clarified that they have the entitlements to <br />build. The owner received administrative permit use in the MED zoning district and <br />they received conceptual site plan approval. They will have to come back for final <br />site plan approval with a more detailed drawing. <br />Mr. Polackwich questioned Staff about planned development rezoning. He <br />stated that it seems like the residential rezonings for developments that the <br />commission was approving have become planned development, and suddenly <br />development was allowed under planned development that hadn't previously been <br />allowed under the existing zoning process for that piece of land. Mr. Sweeney <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.