Laserfiche WebLink
agreed. that the commission has reviewed more planned developments, but out; of <br />those only a quarter have been PD rezonings and many of them are making a <br />slight changes to their site plans, not rezoning the entire projects. Mr. Sweeney <br />clarified that PD rezonings are controlled through a set plan. <br />Mr. Landers stated that there is a quid pro quo relationship with builders and <br />the county and reiterated the improvement of 11 th Drive, additional turn lane and <br />stormwater. Mr. Sweeney stated that we couldn't require those things be done iin <br />the traditional development process. <br />Mr. Polackwich questioned the meaning of the dotted line on the plans on <br />the south end of 11th Drive joining 12th Court. He stated that it seems as if he traffic <br />from this empties on to 37th Street. Mr. Polackwich voiced his concern about the <br />traffic circulation that would need to be addressed in the future. Mr. Sweeney <br />clarified that it is a conceptual plan and the County is working on plans to continue <br />11th Drive down to 371h Street and form a "T" intersection that would be signalized. <br />Mr. Polackwich added to that comment by suggesting a le rn lane. Mr. Matson <br />responded statin(1-44�hat--t a will probably be less tly i t expected, and <br />ultimately it will signali o h IIIc -res s . <br />Mr. Pola k ich state con rns abo-t p opos d 'Pte <br />numbers, <br />that they seem a treme. r S eney6 ed t t the er of and are on 'a <br />smaller scale. ; r.rTd�ques roved th o th oad vement as to <br />whether there was a deadline, or if it will bed a in phases prior to CO (Certificate <br />of Occupancy) of neighborhood. Mr. Sweeney stated that the timeline is laid out in <br />the Developer's Agreement, but reiterated that it would be need to be completed <br />during the first phase of development which would be the south-eastern phase of <br />the overall project. Mr. Sweeney informed Mr. Landers that the County has the <br />option to proceed on their own accord to build 11 th Drive if the project doesn't move <br />forward. <br />Mr. Sweeney clarified that the project is not affordable housing in that there <br />needs to be a criteria met, this project is classified ad affordable workforce housing <br />for hospital workers and fringe industries ofthe like. Ms. Barrenborg asked if the <br />housing would be limited to one market. Mr. Sweeny stated that it would not be. <br />Steve Moler, of Masteller & Moler, Inc., Representative of the Applicant <br />stated that they have been working on 11 th Drive for a very long time because it <br />was something the County wanted, it wasn't on the original plans on the original <br />69 <br />