Laserfiche WebLink
This revision reflects the similarity between state and county <br />roads in terms of roadway design and capacity. <br />- Policies 8.3 and 8.5 <br />Another change affecting the Traffic Circulation Element has taken <br />place since plan adoption. Due to population growth, a portion of <br />the county now meets the definition of an urban area and, <br />therefore, is now served by a Metropolitan Planning Organization <br />(MPO). For that reason, another portion of the proposed amendment <br />is to modify Traffic Circulation Element Policies 8.3 and 8.5, <br />dealing with coordination between governments at all levels, to <br />reflect the existence and activities of the MPO. <br />- Citrus Highway (County Road 609) <br />The Citrus Highway is a proposed two-lane roadway to be located <br />within a corridor -traversing Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River <br />Counties. Beginning at S.R. 710 (the Beeline Highway) in Martin <br />County and extending north through St. Lucie County to C.R. 510 <br />(Wabasso Road) in Indian River County, the highway is to provide a <br />roadway to serve large citrus hauling trucks traveling from groves <br />to packinghouses and from packinghouses to markets. It is <br />anticipated that the diversion of this heavy truck traffic will <br />relieve present and projected congestion on U.S. 1 and several <br />east -west corridors (e.g. S.R. 601 S.R. 68, and S.R. 70). <br />° Citrus Highway Amendment History <br />The fact that the Citrus Highway was included in FDOT's Florida <br />Transportation Plan, but not in the county's comprehensive plan, <br />was first identified by the State Department of Community Affairs <br />(DCA), the agency which reviews. the plans of state agencies as well <br />as local governments. In an August 14, 1992 letter, a copy of <br />which was sent to county planning staff, DCA notified FDOT that the <br />Citrus Highway was not included in Indian River County's <br />Comprehensive Plan. In response, the county initiated an amendment <br />in January 1993 to update its comprehensive plan to include the <br />Citrus Highway. <br />On April 22, 1993, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to <br />recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit that <br />proposed amendment to DCA for their review. <br />At its meeting of June 22, 1993, the Board of County Commissioners <br />considered the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and <br />voted 5-0 to transmit that proposed amendment to DCA for their <br />review. <br />Consistent with state regulations, DCA reviewed the proposed <br />amendment and prepared an Objections, Recommendations and Comments <br />(ORC) Report. The county received that report on October 11, 1993. <br />In that ORC report, DCA noted that a Corridor Planning and Design <br />Report (CPDR) had not been completed. DCA's position was that the <br />results of the CPDR were needed to support the justification for <br />the Citrus Highway as well as the selection of a particular route. <br />For that reason, the county withdrew the proposed Citrus Highway <br />amendment. <br />With the recent completion of the CPDR, staff has again initiated <br />a request to incorporate the Citrus Highway into the county's <br />comprehensive plan. The CPDR determined that the project. is <br />justified and feasible. That report recommends 82nd Avenue as the <br />best alignment for the Citrus Highway in Indian River County. <br />JUNE 139 1995 12 <br />