Laserfiche WebLink
4. Proposed Land Use Designation: M-1, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />5. Most Intense Use with Proposed Land Use Designation: 120 units <br />For commercial/ industrial land use amendment requests, the most <br />intense use (according to the County's LDR's) is retail commercial <br />with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land <br />proposed for redesignation. The site information used for the <br />concurrency analysis of Subject Properties 2, 3 and 4, the <br />commercial/ industrial portion of the proposed amendment, is as <br />follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Redesignated: ±15 acres <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: M-10, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Most Intense Use with Existing Land Use Designation: 120 units <br />4. Proposed Land Use Designation: C/ I, Commercial/ <br />Industrial Mode <br />5. Most Intense Use with Proposed <br />Land Use Designation: 150,000 square feet. of <br />Retail Commercial <br />(Shopping Center in the <br />5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This land use amendment request is exempt from <br />concurrency review because the requested land use designation <br />changes would not increase the square footage of retail commercial <br />use or the total number of potential units that the sites could <br />accommodate. <br />It is important to note that there will be no effect on service <br />levels for any public facility as a result of this land use <br />designation amendment. <br />In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in <br />conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will <br />address facility service levels and demand. <br />Compatibility with the Surroundina Area <br />- Subject Property 1 <br />The proposed amendment will not increase potential <br />incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property <br />1. In fact, the proposed amendment would enhance the site's <br />compatibility with the existing residential development abutting <br />the site along 58th Avenue. <br />Currently, residential and industrial zoning districts abut the <br />site's northern and western borders as well as the westernmost <br />Portion the southern border. The proposed amendment will simply <br />reduce the length of and move the location of the border where the <br />two zoning districts abut. Furthermore, at ±15 acres the site is <br />large enough for residential and/or institutional development to <br />buffer itself from adjacent industrial uses. <br />JLWE 139 1995 54 BOOK 95 PAGE394 <br />