6/13/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

30OK 95 PACE -395 For these reasons, the proposed amendment will not increase potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property 1. - Subject Property 2 The proposed amendment is not anticipated to increase potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property 2. Since the site abuts C/I designated land on the west, the request is for an extension of an existing land use designation pattern. The primary impacts of commercial development on the site would be on the surrounding residentially designated and zoned properties, particularly on the parcel that -borders the site on two sides. The active citrus groves to the north and east of Subject Property 2 range in size from approximately 8.5 acres to approximately 62 acres. If converted to residential uses, the resulting developments would be large enough to provide adequate buffers and to orient residences away -from Subject Property 2. The parcels fronting on 82nd. Street are smaller. The parcel that borders the site on two sides is approximately 1 acre in size. Five of the six lots on the south side of 82nd Street are approximately one quarter of an acre in size, while the sixth is approximately 0.42 acres in size. Five of those lots contain single-family residences. Several factors, however, can work to mitigate potential impacts on those properties. The first factor is required setbacks and buffers. Where commercial development on the site abuts single- family residential development, the commercial development must provide, at a minimum, a 25 foot wide front yard or a 10 foot wide side yard, and a type B landscaped buffer with a 6 foot high opaque feature. Additionally, building coverage for commercial development on the site would be restricted to a maximum of 40% of the lot, while a minimum of 25% of the site must be open, or green space. Through the site planning process for commercial development, the required open space can often be located adjacent to bordering residential areas. To take advantage of access from U.S. #1, and to reduce road paving costs, commercial development on Subject Property 2 would be particularly likely to be developed in this way. Finally, LDR chapter 926 requires perimeter landscaping, as well as landscaping of parking lots, and open space. For these reasons, the proposed amendment is not anticipated to increase potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property 2. - Subject Property 3 Commercial development on Subject Property 3 is not anticipated to increase potential incompatibilities. with surrounding property. The proposed amendment is to allow for the continuation of the existing land use designation from the west. Because the request is to move the location of the boundary between the commercial/ industrial and residential land use designations, the primary impacts of commercial development on the site would be on the two parcels abutting Subject Property 3 on the east. The eastern boundary of Subject Property 3, running from 81st Street to 82nd Street, is approximately 300 feet long. That boundary is shared with two parcels, each approximately 150 feet deep and developed with a single-family house. JUNE 139 1995 55 M M M _I