Laserfiche WebLink
- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23 states that 70% of the land <br />area of a node should be developed with non-residential and non- <br />agricultural uses before that node is 'considered for expansion.. <br />When considered separately, the nodes containing Subject Properties <br />21 3 and 4 do not meet this standard. <br />The intent of this policy, however, is to regulate increases in the <br />amount of C/I designated land. Since there would be no increase in <br />the amount of C/I designated land associated with this amendment, <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.23's 70% developed standard does <br />not apply to this.amendment. _ <br />- Future Land Use Element Policy 1.24 <br />Future Land Use Policy 1.24 states that any property redesignated <br />commercial through a land use plan amendment shall revert to its <br />former designation if construction on the site has not commenced <br />within a two year period, unless such timeframe is modified by the <br />Board of County Commissioners as part of a development agreement. <br />This policy decreases land speculation, and helps ensure that <br />demand for additional C/I designated land is present before <br />requests to expand nodes are approved. This policy also allows for <br />the correction of nodes mistakenly expanded in the absence of <br />demand for more C/I designated land. <br />- Economic Development Element Policy 1.1 <br />Economic Development Element Policy 1.1 states that the county <br />shall encourage the attraction of new businesses. The proposed <br />amendment will move C/I designated land from an area where it is <br />unlikely to be used to an area where it will be developed. Since <br />Subject Properties 2, 3 and 4 are located in fast growing areas <br />which are attractive to commercial businesses, the proposed <br />amendment is consistent with Economic Development Element Policy <br />1.1. <br />While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this <br />request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have <br />relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the subject request <br />for consistency with all plan policies and objectives. Based upon <br />that analysis, staff determined that the request is consistent with <br />the comprehensive plan. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />County environmental permitting requirements, including wetland <br />regulations and the 10%-15% native upland plant community set-aside <br />requirement, are the same under either commercial/ industrial or <br />residential land use designations. <br />Only Subject Property 1 contains environmentally significant land. <br />Although most of that site consists of abandoned citrus groves, and <br />therefore has been disturbed, there are approximately 1.6 acres of <br />scrubby flatwoods on the site. Due to the presence of the scrubby <br />flatwoods,'development of Subject Property -1 under either the <br />existing commercial/ industrial or the requested residential land <br />use designation would be subject to the county's 10%-15% native <br />upland plant community set-aside requirement. Compared to <br />commercial/ industrial use, however, residential development may be <br />more likely to preserve the native habitat areas for their <br />aesthetic value. <br />JUNE 139 1995 59 <br />M M <br />M <br />