6/13/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M M Additionally, Subject Property 1 may contain protected gopher tortoises. For this reason, an environmental survey would be required prior site development. Any gopher tortoises determined by the survey to exist on the site would have to be relocated prior to site development. As with other environmental regulations, these provisions apply under both the commercial/industrial and the residential land use designations. Since Subject Properties 2 and 4 have been used for citrus groves, and therefore have been disturbed, development of those sites under either the existing residential or the requested commercial/ industrial land use designation would have no significant negative environmental impacts. Since Subject Property 3 has also been disturbed, development of that site, regardless of the land use designation, would also have no significant negative environmental impacts. For these reasons, the proposed land use amendment would have no significant detrimental effects on the environment at any of the subject sites. CONCLUSION As proposed, the land use designation changes at each of the subject sites are consistent with the comprehensive plan, are not anticipated to increase potential incompatibilities with surrounding land uses, and will cause no adverse impacts on the environment or the provision of public services. For these reasons, staff supports the request. RECONNENDATION Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit this request to DCA and request DCA and all reviewing agencies to conduct a full review of the amendment. Director Keating stated that this is the most complex of the amendments and reminded the Board that rezoning of the properties in question is not under consideration today. Property Number 1 is in the node and is to be removed from the node and redesignated from C/I to M-1. This is a 15 acre parcel which is proposed to be used for a church. The properties to the west and to the north of this property are already designated residential. Director Keating continued the other properties are being added to a node. Property Number 2 is 8.8 acres east of US #1, north of 82nd Street, to be redesignated from M-1 to C/I. Property Number 3 is a .7 acre parcel south of Property Number 2 to be redesignated from M-1 to C/I. Property Number 4 is an extension of property to the north that was redesignated about 1 year ago from M-1 to C/I. This redesignation will add 5.5 acres to the south of the previously redesignated parcel. JUNE 139 1995 60 %