Laserfiche WebLink
After the CONSULTANT received notice -to -proceed for WO No.5, the OWNER requested that three <br />additional modeling simulations be conducted to determine the withdrawal flow split between the <br />north and south wellfields. Also, the OWNER requested approval from the SJRWMD to use the existing <br />calibrated groundwater models developed by the CONSULTANT in 2016 for the 2020 CUP modification. <br />On January 13, 2020, SJRWMD provided approval for the use of the model but requested that a <br />revised/updated groundwater modeling plan be submitted to the District for review and approval. <br />Amendment 1 was issued to provide the three additional modeling simulations and revision of the 2016 <br />groundwater modeling plan. <br />In addition to North County and South County wellfields, the OWNER is now considering three other <br />groundwater withdrawal alternatives. The first alternative is to move the additional requested allocation <br />to a potential new UFA wellfield on County -owned property in the western part of the County to <br />distribute the pumping, reduce groundwater level drawdown and reduce the potential impacts to <br />existing legal users of the UFA. The second alternative is to move a portion of the requested allocation <br />to the Avon Park Permeable Zone (APPZ) located below the, UFA at both the north and south wellfields. <br />The third alternative will consider pumping from the County's existing wellfield at an interim allocation <br />based on short-term projected demand. The OWNERS withdrawal allocation under their exiting CUP is <br />12.84 mgd from 2021-2031 and does not provide for any growth in demand over this time period. This <br />alternative would provide County time to analyze the first two alternatives and finalize the one to satisfy <br />County's long-term water supply needs. Additional modeling simulations are therefore necessary to <br />determine whether these three new wellfield alternatives will cause any adverse impacts to water <br />resources, environmental resources, and other existing legal users. <br />This Amendment has been developed to provide the additional groundwater modeling services <br />requested by the OWNER. <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br />The following is a description of the work to be provided under this Amendment. <br />TASK 1- ADDITIONAL GROUNDWATER MODELING SIMULATIONS <br />The CONSULTANT will perform three additional groundwater model simulations with the modified ECFM <br />to determine if the three new wellfield alternatives will cause any adverse impacts to water resources, <br />environmental resources, and other legal users. The modified ECFM model was used during previous <br />permit modification attempt in 2016 and has been approved by SJRWMD for use in support of the <br />current CUP modification. <br />The three groundwater modeling simulations will be performed using the End -of -Permit (EOP) <br />withdrawals for all permitted users and OWNER wells pumping at the requested allocation increase. A <br />detailed description of these three simulations is listed below: <br />1. Simulation 7 (SIM7) — Existing North County and South County wellfield wells will be pumping at <br />their current permitted allocation of 12.84 mgd. The requested additional allocation of 10.34 <br />mgd to will be withdrawn from the proposed West County wellfield. The combined withdrawals <br />from the existing and proposed wellfields will be 23.18 mgd. Other legal user wells within the <br />model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate, except for the agricultural use <br />wells whose EOP allocations will be adjusted to 5 in 10 -year factors provided by SJRWMD. <br />Smith Page 2 Of 6 jj3005_Fxhlbits.doa <br />