2021-082D - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Simulation 8 (SIMS) — Existing North County and South County wellfield wells will be pumping at their current permitted allocation of 12.84 mgd. The requested additional allocation of 10.34 mgd will be evenly split between the two proposed APPZ wellfields, one located near the North County Wellfield and the other located near the South County Wellfield. The combined withdrawals from the existing and proposed wellfields will be 23.18 mgd. Other existing legal user wells within the model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate, except for the agricultural use wells whose EOP allocations will be adjusted to 5 in 10 -year factors provided by SJ RW M D. Simulation 9 (SIM9) - Existing North County and South County wellfield wells will be pumped at a combined pumping rate that affects the smallest number of other existing legal users. This pumping rate will be obtained by an iterative process of increasing the pumping rate from 12.84 mgd until arriving at a pumping rate that produces impacts to the smallest number of other existing legal users. Other existing legal user wells within the model domain pumping at their current EOP withdrawal rate, except for the agricultural use wells whose EOP allocations will be adjusted to 5 and 10 -year factors provided by SJRWMD. Simulations 7, 8, and 9 will be used by the CONSULTANT and OWNER in determining the groundwater level drawdown due to the total proposed OWNER EOP withdrawal occurring from each wellfield. The deliverable for this task will be maps showing the cone of depression (groundwater level drawdown) for each wellfield pumping scenario and contours of cumulative groundwater level drawdown due to pumping. The results of these simulations are for OWNER internal purposes only and will not be submitted to SJRWMD in the groundwater modeling and impact evaluation. TASK 2 - PROJECT AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this Work Order is consistent with CONSULTANT's standards and the OWNER's requirements. Specific activities included are identified below: Subtask 2.1- Project Quality Management CONSULTANT maintains a Quality Management System (QMS) on all projects. In accordance with the QMS, a project planning and scope review meeting will be conducted at the start of the project. In addition, the CONSULTANT's Technical Specialists will perform a quality review of the maps identified in Task 1. Subtask 2.2 - Project Status Reports CONSULTANT's project manager will prepare and submit monthly written status reports with each invoice for an anticipated project duration of 1 month. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS WORK ORDER This Work Order does not include the following items; • Identifying potential wellfield or well locations in the western part of Indian River County; • Identifying potential wellfield or well locations near the South County and North County Wellfields for the proposed APPZ wellfields; and Smith Page 3 of 6 j13005_Exhlbits.doa