Laserfiche WebLink
� � r <br />an illegal place by an unauthorized person, and he was not sure <br />exactly what should be done. <br />Commissioner Bird believed it was obvious that a two-day <br />notice had to be given prior to 48 hours before the election and it <br />seemed to him that the penalty should be more severe for someone <br />that does not post the bond. Commissioner Eggert reiterated that <br />the penalty was $500 or 60 days, and Commissioner Bird agreed that <br />was more severe, if we enforce it. <br />Chairman Macht felt there should be no problem with signs <br />provided the candidate cooperated with Code Enforcement. He then <br />asked, if the motion carried, if the amnesty would include the <br />second appellant, Kathaleen Inman, as well. <br />There was CONSENSUS that Kathaleen Inman's <br />appeal was included in the motion. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested that, on the sign permit <br />application, perhaps a special emergency phone number could be <br />assigned regarding election signs. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />motion carried unanimously. <br />PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - KATHALEEN RWAN APPEAL <br />DENIAL OF POLITICAL SIGN REMOVAL BOND REFUND <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 11, 1995: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D R NT HEAD CONCUR ENCE: <br />Obert M. Ke t ng, A1CP <br />Community Developm nt Di ctor <br />FROM: Roland M. DeBloigPrICP <br />Chief, Environmental Planning <br />& Code Enforcement <br />DATE: July 11, 1995 <br />SUBJECT: Kathaleen Inman Appeal of Staff's Decision to Deny <br />Refund of a Political Sign Removal Bond <br />23 <br />July 18, 1995 BOOK 95 ma 723 <br />