My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/18/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
7/18/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:42:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/18/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 95 PIKE �_X <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of July 18, 1995. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />This agenda item pertains to Rathaleen Inman's appeal of staff's <br />decision to deny refund of a $250 political sign removal bond due <br />to the applicant's noncompliance with county sign ordinance <br />requirements. In accordance with County Code Section 902.07, such <br />appeals of staff's decisions are heard by the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission, and may be further appealed to the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting of May 25, 1995, <br />heard Ms. Inman's appeal and, by a vote of 4 to 3, upheld staff's <br />denial of the bond refund (see attached minutes excerpt). Ms. Inman <br />has now appealed the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision to <br />the Board of County Commissioners. <br />Background <br />During the Fall, 1994 election period, a number of political <br />candidates placed political signs throughout the county. Within <br />the unincorporated area, County Code Section 956.15-(1) provides <br />regulations for temporary political campaign signs (see attached). <br />On September 27, 1994, county staff issued a sign zoning permit to <br />Ms. Inman, allowing the placement of temporary political signs <br />throughout the unincorporated county. The permit included specific <br />conditions relating to sign location and size allowances. <br />Subsection 956.15(1)(c) of the County Code requires the posting of <br />a $250 security bond prior to the placement of political signs, and <br />specifies that this bond may be forfeited for any of the following <br />reasons (paraphrased): <br />1. Failure to remove all signs within five days of the <br />applicable election; <br />2. Placement of signs on any tree, utility pole or similar <br />object; <br />3. Placement of any sign without permission of the <br />applicable property owner; or <br />4. Authorizing placement of sign(s) or allowing sign(s) <br />to remain more than two days after notice of any signs in <br />violation of county regulations. Illegally placed signs <br />are prima facie evidence that a candidate placed or <br />authorized placement of said sign(s). [NOTE: this <br />paragraph was amended in May, 1995, but was in <br />effect at the time of sign permit issuance and bond <br />refund denial.] <br />On November 8, 1994, the day of the general election, code <br />enforcement staff removed a number of political campaign signs, <br />including 26 Inman campaign signs, from road rights-of-way in the <br />county. Specifically, Inman campaign signs were removed from <br />rights-of-way at: <br />- Polling places of Precincts 36, 41 and 42 <br />- 58th Ave. and S.R. 60 <br />- 6600 block of S.R. 60 <br />- 85th Street and Old Dixie Hwy. <br />- U.S. #1 and 85th Street <br />24 <br />July 18, 1995 <br />(3 signs) <br />(4 signs) <br />(1 sign) <br />(1 sign) <br />-(2 signs) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.