10/16/2001 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

IF fI F IF Itt v s rr ate vx ' r ; a tL1 uc. e Concurrency of Public Facilities The subject properties are located outside of the county Urban Service Area ; therefore , they are not currently suited for urban scale development .Regardless , the Comprehensive Plan establishes minimum development standards for: Transportation , Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste , Stormwater Management and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3 . 1 ) . The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community . The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations (LDRs) require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. Policy 3 . 2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment requests , conditional concurrency review is required . Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of each facility with respect to a proposed project . Since Comprehensive Plan amendment requests are not projects , county regulations call for the concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon the requested land use designation .For residential Comprehensive Plan amendment requests , the most intense use ( according to the County ' s LDRs ) is the maximum number of units that could be built on the site , given the size of the property and the maximum density under the proposed land use designation . The site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows : 1 . Size of Area to be Redesignated : ±164 . 1 acres 2 . Existing Land Use Designation : AG- 1 , Agricultural - 1 ( up to 1 unit/5 acres) 3 . Proposed Land Use Designation : T , Transitional Residential (up to 1 unit/acre ; or up to 3 units/acre for Planned Development Projects ) 4 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Current Land Use Designation :32 Single - Family Units 5 . Most Intense Use of Subject Property Under Proposed Land Use Designation : 492 Single-Family Units Transportation As part of the concurrency review process , staff analyzes the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation , and assigns those trips to impacted roads . Impacted roads are defined in section 910 . 09 (4)(b) 3 of the county ' s LDRs as roadway segments which receive five percent (5 % ) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more project trips , whichever is less . According to staff' s analysis , the existing level of service on impacted roadways would not be lowered by the traffic generated by development of 492 single - family units on the subject properties . Attachment 2 of this staff report contains a more detailed transportation concurrency analysis . October 16 , 2001 122 q e r G 3 S 1 IF IF IF 11 IF IF I