My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
9/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:12 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 2:57:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />SPOOK 96 F'A r ��41� <br />Chairman Macht felt this meeting is disintegrating into <br />negotiations on a site plan. <br />Dennis Smith wondered how many times the Board would allow <br />exemptions on the time frames. <br />Fred Mensing of Sebastian was concerned with the "occupied <br />dwelling", and it was explained to him that it applied only to a <br />neighbor's dwelling, an adjacent occupied dwelling. <br />Commissioner Adams felt the whole issue of this particular <br />site plan needs to go back to the Technical Review Committee. She <br />suggested that they address a stormwater/stormwater reuse plan. <br />Director Keating advised that Mr. Luethje's proposal cannot be <br />addressed by the Technical Review Committee until we go forward <br />with LDR amendments. The Professional Services Advisory Committee <br />(PSAC) is starting on the amendments, and it will probably be about <br />the first of the year before the LDRs come to the Board. He asked <br />if the Board wants to look at a provision for a large site <br />incidental to construction. <br />Chairman Macht stated that we just want staff to gather the <br />information and bring it back to the Board first. He emphasized <br />that the main reason we are here today is to discuss the separation <br />distances and we have not heard from any of the mining operators <br />about that issue. <br />Commissioner Eggert preferred to have the issues go to the <br />PSAC before proposed LDR changes are brought back to the Board at <br />a regular meeting. <br />Commissioner Bird believed, from what he has heard today, <br />there would not be any changes made to commercial mining <br />requirements. He believed the time limit for mines incidental to <br />construction is going to have to be geared to the size of the <br />project. <br />Director Keating understood then that staff will bring this to <br />the PSAC for a recommendation before bringing it back to the Board. <br />Commissioner Bird pointed out that staff and the PSAC need to <br />consider possible LDR changes in relation to the two proposals by <br />Mr. Luethje. <br />There being no further comments, the Chairman closed the <br />public discussion, and adjourned the meeting at 10:37 a.m. <br />ATTEST: <br />,,� Q: <br />J'.—K'. Barton, Clerk <br />Minutes approved�0 <br />16 <br />SEPTEMBER 21, 1995 W W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.