My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/26/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
9/26/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:13 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:00:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/26/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Please do not approve of population densities greater than one unit per acre in this <br />region of the County, such as the high densities proposed by the Hammock Lakes <br />Subdivision. Please insure developments adjacent to major drainage systems to the Indian <br />River Lagoon such as the Hammock Lakes Subdivision leave a marginal vegetated, <br />uninhabited buffer between the development and adjacent canals. Please consider leaving <br />some parks and green space, such as broad green belts, in between 43rd Avenue and 66th <br />Avenue, etc. to I-95. If all of this land is residential and commercial how will Vero Beach <br />and Indian River County differ from Miami and Fort Lauderdale? How will the Indian River <br />Lagoon differ from Sarasota Bay? I could write an epitaph for this American Lagoon of <br />National Significance. As proposed, the Hammock Lakes Subdivision will help me write <br />this epitaph. It is up to you to see that I do not. <br />5920 1st Street SW <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32968 <br />William Hamilton, of 5900 1st Street SW, stated that he has <br />lived here for 10 years and in Dade County for 34 years where he <br />was in the construction business. He never built houses on lots <br />this small and does not think it is practical in this community. <br />He is not against progress but does not see any point in building <br />houses so'close together. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard in this <br />matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Adams asked for an explanation from staff about <br />the 40% open space, and Community Development Director Bob Keating <br />responded there was a different interpretation between the County <br />Attorney and staff but the Board had agreed that staff's <br />interpretation was correct. The controversy involved whether open <br />space on lots could be considered a part of the entire project and <br />this interpretation is consistent with other projects in the area. <br />There will probably be more than 44% open space as most lots will <br />have more than the minimum footage. <br />Commissioner Bird questioned whether the project will contain <br />runoff internally, and Director Keating responded that the project <br />meets all standards. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that it would be nice to have <br />everyone on 1 acre lots but that would take a great many acres to <br />accomplish. <br />Director Keating felt that affordable housing is also a <br />concern. <br />SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 26 <br />_I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.