My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/05/2021 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2021
>
10/05/2021 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2022 2:30:46 PM
Creation date
5/31/2022 2:11:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/05/2021
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
choose? Will you have to offer pre vaccination physical examinations and blood work in order to <br />obtain a baseline for each employee? <br />The workers' compensation system has a two year statute of limitations, but if the alleged <br />condition could not be identified or related to the vaccination within that window of time the <br />statute of limitations is extended. As you can see, this is a very complicated issue that is far <br />beyond the decision to pay or not pay the federal penalty that is likely unlawful. <br />The fourth topic warranting consideration is the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some of your <br />employees may have pre existing conditions that make the vaccines contraindicated. The <br />employees already have an established job description that defines the essential functions of the <br />job. A vaccination is not an essential function of their job. How do you provide a reasonable <br />accommodation? What are the implications if you do not? <br />It is unfortunate that the Biden Administration is about to put you in this position. The cost <br />benefit analysis is not clear cut. <br />For those who might ask "why don't they just get the vaccination?", I will point out that the <br />decision you face is not about the vaccination. The decision is about the ability of your <br />employees to exercise the liberty given them, not by government, to make personal health <br />decisions. On this topic I would like to finish by sharing a story I believe to be relevant. A friend <br />of mine who has been fully vaccinated came down with COVID. His symptoms were so subtle <br />he did not know he was sick. He unwittingly exposed his office staff and they became sick. <br />One of them had a significant pre-existing condition, but mercifully she is okay now. <br />We are told the vaccines do not guarantee you will not get the disease, but will minimize your <br />symptoms if you do get the disease. If what we are told is true, then there is a risk that a <br />vaccinated person could have COVID, but with symptoms so minimal as to be ambiguous or <br />unnoticed. That person would have no reason to change their behaviors and could expose <br />many. Would it not be reasonable for a person with a high risk friend or family member to not be <br />vaccinated so that they can better self monitor possible symptoms? <br />I share this observation to demonstrate the vaccination decision is not monolithic. <br />Again, I appreciate your service. This letter is intended to help you make a decision that is as <br />well informed as possible. Thank you for your time. <br />Sincer , <br />Paul L Westcott, Esq. <br />)0A3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.