Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in <br />conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will <br />address facility service levels and demand. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />- Subject Property 1 <br />The proposed amendment will not increase potential <br />incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property <br />1. In fact, the proposed amendment would enhance the site's <br />compatibility with the existing residential development abutting <br />the site along 58th Avenue. <br />Currently, residential and industrial zoning districts abut the <br />site's northern and western borders as well as the westernmost <br />portion the southern border. The proposed amendment will simply <br />reduce the length of and move the location of the border where the <br />two zoning districts abut. Furthermore, at ±15 acres the site is <br />large enough for residential and/or .institutional development to <br />buffer itself from adjacent industrial uses. <br />For these reasons, the proposed amendment will not increase <br />potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject <br />Property 1. <br />- Subject Property 2 <br />The proposed amendment is not anticipated to increase- potential <br />incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property <br />2. Since the site abuts C/I designated land on the west, the <br />request is for an extension of an existing land use designation <br />pattern. <br />The primary impacts of commercial development on the site would be <br />on the surrounding residentially designated and zoned properties, <br />particularly on the parcel that borders the site on two sides. <br />The active citrus groves to the north and east of Subject Property <br />2 range in site from approximately 8.5 acres to approximately 62 <br />acres. If converted to residential uses, the resulting <br />developments would be large enough to provide adequate buffers and <br />to orient residences away from Subject Property 2. <br />The parcels fronting on 82nd Street are smaller. The parcel that <br />borders the site on two sides is approximately 1 acre in size. <br />Five of the six lots on the south side of 82nd Street are <br />approximately one quarter of an acre in size, while the sixth is <br />approximately 0.42 acres in size. Five of those lots contain <br />single-family residences. <br />Several factors, however, can work to mitigate potential impacts on <br />those properties. The first factor is required setbacks and <br />buffers. Where commercial development on the site abuts single- <br />family residential development, the commercial development must <br />provide, at a minimum, a 25 foot wide front yard or a 10 foot wide <br />side yard, and a type B landscaped buffer with a 6 foot high opaque <br />feature. <br />Additionally, building coverage for commercial development on the <br />site would be restricted to a maximum of 408 of the lot, while a <br />minimum of 25% of the site must be ---open, or green space. Through <br />the site planning process for commercial development, the required <br />open space can often be located adjacent to bordering residential <br />areas. To take advantage of access from U.S. #1, and to reduce <br />road paving costs, commercial development on Subject Property 2 <br />would be particularly likely to be developed in this way. <br />97 <br />October 24, 1995 BOOK 96 Pa . 481 <br />