My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-117
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2020's
>
2022
>
2022-117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2022 11:44:15 AM
Creation date
6/27/2022 11:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Work Order
Approved Date
06/14/2022
Control Number
2022-117
Agenda Item Number
8.K.
Entity Name
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Subject
Work Order No. 9 for Upper Floridan Aquifer Modeling
and Consumptive Use Permit Modification
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
modification of the County's CUP. The Consultant will also review SJRWMD <br />recommended modeling tools to be used for the impact evaluation, including the recently <br />released update expanded East Central Florida Transient Model (ECFTX) Groundwater <br />Vistas Regulatory Version 2.0 and the existing COUAQ modeling that could be updated, <br />as well as the updated ECFM model developed by SFWMD. Following the data and model <br />review, the final proposed modeling approach shall be documented in a technical <br />memorandum, reviewed by the County, and then submitted to SJRWMD CUP staff for <br />review and concurrence. Modeling will not commence until SJRWMD has approved the <br />approach memorandum. <br />It is noted that discussions with SIRWMD are ongoing regarding the need to assess <br />potential impacts to the surficial aquifer system (SAS), since the County previously <br />demonstrated that proposed Floridan aquifer system (FAS) withdrawals showed no <br />potential impact on the SAS. If SJRWMD staff determines the County does not need to <br />further assess potential impacts to the SAS, then efforts involving the ECFTX or COUAQ <br />Models shall be eliminated from this scope with no cost to the County incurred. <br />Task 2: Coordination with SJRWMD (Lump Sum) <br />The Consultant will prepare for and participate in meetings with SJRWMD at critical <br />milestones throughout this process. This task will include one modeling approach memo <br />review meeting, one pre -application meeting, two review meetings during modeling phase, <br />up to seven monthly progress meetings with SJRWMD staff and two interim review <br />meetings with County staff. All meetings will be virtual, unless otherwise requested by the <br />County or SJRWMD. <br />Task 3: Groundwater Modeling Evaluation (Lump Sum) <br />Upon approval of the approach memorandum by SJRWMD, the Consultant will begin <br />preparing the groundwater model and selected scenarios. The proposed groundwater <br />__modeling_w-ork_involves_modifying_and applyinge�xisting-calibrated SFWMD and SJRWMD <br />groundwater models to simulate the County's North and South wellfields in response to <br />proposed allocation changes. The ECFM was developed and updated by the SFWMD and is <br />the SJRWMD recommended tool to evaluate the County's FAS withdrawals on FAS related <br />impact criteria. The ECFTX was developed and updated by SJRWMD and is the SJRWMD <br />recommended tool to evaluate the County' FAS withdrawals on SAS related impact criteria, <br />if needed; however, the existing COUAQ modeling may be updated as a result of Task 1 <br />findings in lieu of applying the ECFTX Model. <br />The models will be modified as needed and executed consistent with criteria described in the <br />SJRWMD Applicant's Handbook. Modeling will include the existing condition and proposed <br />groundwater model simulations due to increasing the North Wellfield allocation by 3.39 <br />MGD. ELUs within the cone of depression will be simulated along with the proposed use in a <br />cumulative modeling scenario. Model performance will be presented using drawdown <br />contours, simulated changes in water level and quality, and water budget summaries. The <br />intent of the model scenarios is to provide reasonable assurances consistent with SJRWMD <br />permitting criteria that proposed withdrawals do not result in: 1) adverse impacts to the water <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.