My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/21/1995
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1995
>
11/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:05:13 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:14:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
View images
View plain text
_I <br />BOOK 96 PACE 629 <br />- Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2 <br />Mass Transit Element Policy 1.2_ states that the county will, <br />through the future land use element, provide higher densities along <br />major transportation corridors in order to facilitate future mass <br />transit provision. Since the proposed amendment will increase the <br />allowed density along and near several major transportation <br />corridors, this request is consistent with Mass Transit Element <br />Policy 1.2. <br />As part of its consistency analysis, staff compared the proposed <br />request to all the objectives and policies in the plan and found no <br />conflicts. Therefore, staff's position is that the proposed <br />amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />Staff's position is that granting the request to redesignate the <br />subject property to M-1 and to rezone it to RM -8 would result in <br />development which is appropriate for the site and that such <br />development would be compatible with surrounding areas. Because <br />the area is located near an'urban center of the county, with <br />convenient access to employment and shopping, the area is <br />particularly suited for medium -density multiple -family development. <br />Since land -to the west is designated M-1, the request is for the <br />continuation of an existing land use designation pattern. <br />The primary impacts of development on the site would be on the <br />abutting single-family zoned area to the east. The western portion <br />of that area, containing the partially developed Walkers Glen West <br />subdivision, is presently in the platting process. While <br />considering the impacts of multiple -family development, staff <br />considered that the site plan approval process can somewhat <br />mitigate those impacts on adjacent single-family lots. Through <br />required separation and buffers, county LDRs can often lessen the <br />impacts of development. <br />In this case, single-family zoned lots east of the subject property <br />would likely abut the subject property with their front or rear <br />yards which would be required to be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The <br />approved preliminary plat for Walkers Glen West shows only 2 lots <br />abutting the subject property. Both of those lots contain a 20 <br />foot wide drainage easement along their border with the subject <br />property. Additionally, the preliminary plat depicts a 6 foot high <br />fence located 20 feet east of the subject property along the entire <br />length of the subdivision. Finally, both lots are at least 90 feet <br />wide, which allows the option of siting the buildings further from <br />the subject property. <br />Under the requested RM -8 zoning district, development on the <br />subject property would be required to provide a landscaped buffer <br />yard that is at least 10 feet wide along the property's eastern <br />border. Additionally, building coverage for multiple -family <br />development on the site would be restricted to a maximum of 25% of <br />the lot, while a minimum of 40% of the site must be open, or green, <br />space. Finally, LDR chapter 926 requires perimeter landscaping, as <br />well as landscaping of parking lots, and open space. <br />For these reasons, staff feels the requested land use designation <br />and zoning district would be compatible with the surrounding area. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />Environmental impacts of residential development on the_ subject <br />property would be the same under either the existing or the <br />proposed land use designation. The site has been cleared, and <br />contains no environmentally important land, such as wetlands or <br />NOVEMBER 21, 1995 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).