Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final October 18, 2022 <br />action is needed at this time. <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />County Attorney Dylan Reingold read the notice into the record. <br />No Action Taken or Required <br />11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS <br />12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS <br />A. Community Development <br />12.A.1. 22-0863 Consideration of the Land Use Visioning Study and Follow -Up Action <br />Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the BCC approve the land use visioning study final report, <br />consider the staff presentation on the Visioning Implementation process, and <br />provide staff with any feedback going forward. <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />Draft Land Use Visioning Study Final Report <br />Community Development Director Phil Matson opened the presentation by giving <br />some background on the purpose of the Land Use Visioning Study. Using a <br />PowerPoint presentation, he outlined what had been done since the Metropolitan <br />Planning Organization (MPO) approved a scope of services for population, <br />development, and rural lands visioning study in 2021. <br />Director Matson stated it was the staff's view the visioning study had featured <br />robust public participation, as evidenced by the more than 600 people in <br />attendance at the numerous public workshops, meetings, and presentations. <br />Based on feedback received, the following six "Visioning Principles" had been <br />identified; 1) Conservation of sensitive environmental lands; 2) Diversity of <br />housing types that include affordable options; 3) Infrastructure improvements that <br />provide mobility and multimodal transportation options; 4) Promote a healthy <br />economy; 5) Maintain agriculture; and 6) Maintain rural character. <br />He stated the visioning study provided both short-term and long-term <br />recommendations for guiding future development. The presentation continued in <br />detail about the adoption and implementation of those recommendations. <br />There was no discussion after the presentation. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher, seconded by Commissioner <br />Adams, to approve staffs recommendation. The motion carried by the <br />following vote: <br />Indian River County Florida Page 10 <br />