2/20/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

setback criteria. Waivers will apply- to interior lots and lots along the north perimeter. *2overall project open space will exceed the 44% requirement." *3As result of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant agreed to 5' rear setbacks for pools, patios, -and decks for interior lots and lots along the north perimeter,.a 10' setback for pools, patios, and decks for the east and west perimeter lots, and a 20' setback for pools, patios, and decks along the south property line. The 10' setback for pools, patios, and decks is consistent with other single family zoning districts in the county. Note: Pursuant to LDR sections 911.15(2) and 915.16(1)(B), pools, patios, and decks have normally been allowed to encroach in the 25' perimeter PD setback for single family planned developments. Although the LDRs allow pools, patios, and decks to be located as close as 10' from the project perimeter property line, the applicant has requested that this be reduced to 5' for interior lots and lots along the north perimeter. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission support this request. 17. Landscaping and Buffering: The planned development compatibility standards require a 25' perimeter building (residence) setback for all planned developments. Landscape buffers can be required within these setbacks, depending upon the proposed type of development within the PD and adjacent development or zoning. For this project, buffers are required as follows: North: Along the north• property line, a double frontage buffer is required, since the proposed lots will have frontage on the internal subdivision street and the collector access road to SR A -1-A. The double frontage buffer requires a 6' opaque feature which the applicant proposes to satisfy by a 2' high earthen berm with 4' high continuous hedge (2' high* at planting with 2 year grow -in period). This proposal meets the section 913.09(3)(c)5 double frontage buffer requirements. These buffer improvements must be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion for Phase I. East: The east project perimeter is adjacent to Baytree Village Condominiums, and all lots along this perimeter will meet the RS -6 dimensional criteria & setbacks. Because these lots will be standard size, typically no buffering is required. However, to address compatibility concerns, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the applicant plant a Type "C" buffer along the eastern property line, and the applicantagreed to this provision. South: Since lots along the south perimeter (see attachment #3) will meet the RS -6 minimum dimensional criteria and the normal RS -6 setbacks, no buffer would be'required. However, based on the Pla.-uning and Zoning Commission's recommended conditions, which reflect the substance of a "compatibility agreement" between the applicant and Marbrisa Property Owners' Association, the applicant has agreed to a special buffer along the south perimeter (see attachment #7). On the Island Club site, the buffer will cover a 20' wide strip of land that will be planted with 80% of the plant material necessary to meet Type B buffer requirements. On adjacent Marbrisa property, which is beyond the scope of the PD proposal, the applicant has agreed with Marbrisa property owners to plant a FEBRUARY 20, 1996