My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/06/2022 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2022
>
12/06/2022 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2023 2:55:57 PM
Creation date
2/23/2023 2:54:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/06/2023
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final December 6, 2022 <br />to the Indian River County Code of Ordinance Section 302.05 allowing for dogs off <br />leash or without restraint. Attorney Reingold sought guidance from the Board to <br />continue to move forward with studying the issue. Commissioner Deryl Loar stated <br />that from the information the Commissioners had received, the public had clearly <br />spoken on this issue and to not have staff continue to study the issue. Additional <br />discussion ensued with each Commissioner adding their comments either for or <br />against staff continuing with the study. <br />Tuck Ferrell, a resident of Ambersands Beach, recounted his experience where he <br />had to defend himself at least twice with off-leash/unrestrained dogs. Along with the <br />concern about dog waste affecting sea turtles, he was not in favor of the proposed <br />Ordinance. <br />Kim Salman, a resident, made comments in favor of an off -leash park as most <br />residents were responsible dog owners and felt this had been blown out of <br />proportion. Ms. Salman sought clarification for the Indian River Shores Beach being <br />designated as a dog beach if you had a permit. She pointed out the only access to the <br />beach was the boardwalk which clearly states no dogs were allowed. Attorney <br />Reingold responded that within a County Park, no dogs were allowed, therefore you <br />were not allowed to use the park as access to the beach. <br />Jeannie Sole, a resident, was not against dogs being on the beach, but expressed <br />concerns for the sea turtle hatchlings and sea birds. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Loar, seconded by Commissioner Flescher, <br />to have staff no longer investigate the issue. The motion carried by the following <br />vote: <br />Aye: 3- Commissioner Flescher, Commissioner Loar, and Commissioner Moss <br />Nay: 2 - Chairman Earman, and Vice Chairman Adams <br />13.B 22-1026 Government in the Sunshine Law Update <br />Attachments: Staff Report <br />County Attorney Dylan Reingold presented the two different concepts with regard to <br />the Sunshine Law that applies to the Board meetings and Public Records law which <br />provides the rights of access to the public to be able to view what the government <br />was doing. He went on to explain the Sunshine Law has three (3) basic requirements: <br />1) notice; 2) opportunity for the public to attend; and 3) minutes of the meeting. He <br />then explained why all three were critical in order for a full, fair, and open opportunity <br />for the public to be informed. The definition of public record was extremely broad <br />and was defined under Florida Law as meaning any documents papers, letters, maps, <br />books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or <br />Indian River County Florida Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.